There are differing opinions on whether underdeveloped countries should participate in international philanthropic activities. Personally, I strongly believe that these countries should be excluded from such initiatives.
Proponents of including all countries, even underdeveloped ones, in global donation plans present clear arguments for their stance. They typically assert that all humans are responsible for helping their peers and should maintain this commitment regardless of their status. For example, if a certain country is struggling with difficult financial issues and has poor people, it should still help other nations for the sake of humanitarian purposes. This perspective could potentially foster a sense of affection and care among different nations, contributing to the strengthening of their international relations.
However, in my view, poor countries should initially focus on enhancing their own condition. We should classify various problems and prioritize them according to their importance, with internal issues of each country taking precedence. If a poor country solves its own economic problems, it can eventually become strong enough to eliminate it dependency on external aid and even help other nations. Therefore, instead of being a donor, they should be a recipient of donations from other nations. This will lead to greater satisfaction within these countries, which is a crucial requirement when considering donations to other parts of the world.
In conclusion, while helping other nations may bring emotional gains for a poor country, the financial drawbacks make this activity irrational and ureasonable. Therefore, it is essential for them to address their own setbacks first.