Part 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write at least 150 words.
Part 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.
The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual ’ income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Samples
Words: 0
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Samples
Words: 0
7.5
6.0
The bar chart illustrates the number of US households, in millions, in five different annual income categories in 2007,2011,2015.
Overall, households earning $75,000-$99,999 had the lowest figure in all three years , while those earning $100,000 or more generally had the highest figure ,except in 2011.
The number of households earning $100,000 or more fell from approximately 29 million in 2007 to 28 million in 2011, before rising significantly to around 33 million in 2015. The number of households earning $25,000-$49,999 increased from about 27 million in 2007 to just under 30 million in 2011 , before falling slightly to approximately 28 million in 2015.
As for households earning less than $25,000, their number rose from 25 million in 2007 to approximately 29 million in 2011 , before declining slightly to 28 million in 2015.
In terms of households earning $50,000-$74,000 the figure remained relatively stable at just over 20 million throughout the period. In contrast , the number of households earning $75,000-$99,999 remained stable at around14 million in 2007 and 2001, before reaching a peak of approximately 15 million in 2015.
IELTS Cambridge 18 writing test 2
The chart provide key information about number of US househohds in 2007,2011 and 2015. The units are measured in millions.
Overall,it is clear from the graph that households in 2015 is using more .In addtion,$100,000 or more spent more in 2007.Whereas it allocated the small amount of the $75,000-$99,999.
According to what is shown,$25,000-$49,999 at 2011is the higher on households than the other years, about 30 millions.The $100,000 or more at 2015 allocated the highest percentages of thier spending to households , nearly about 33%.The lower $25,000-$49,999 at 2007 nearly about 26%.In contrast ,it spent more on $100,000 nearly about 29%.
In terms of number of households , the lowest number of million is $75,000-$99,999 at 2011 nearly to 14%.The $50,000-$74,999 show the constant number nearly to 21%.For all this years it use number of Us households that increase and decreas over the time that help us know more about it.
How to imorove my ielts writing 😭
likewise I feel like a failure
where is my band and feedback
10.20
tor mare chudi
8.0
The bar chart provides information about the number of US households by their annual salary from 2007 to 2015.
Overall, the number of households with an annual income from $75,000 to $99,999 showed the lowest proportion over the period, whereas the families with the highest salaries demonstrated the highest proportion, with the only exception in 2011.
Although the number of households with an annual income of $100,000 or more showed a lower proportion in 2011, in total, the figure increased from approximately 29 million in 2007 to about 33 million in 2015. The families with income equivalent to $25,000-$49,999 accounted for about 26 million, just under 30 million, and about 28 million in 2007, 2011, and 2015, respectively. Regarding the households with the lowest annual income, the figure increased from 25 million to about 28 million throughout the period.
In terms of families with $50,000-$74,999 of yearly salary, the number stood at slightly over 20 million, remaining steady over the whole period. In contrast, households with $75,000-$99,999 of annual income rose from about 14 million to 15 million, reaching its peak in 2015.
7.0
Some argue that the addition of extra subjects to their major subjects is a good idea, whereas others believe that it is more significant to pay attention to studying for a qualification. Although there are some advantages of learning about other subjects, I personally think that the benefit of focusing the major subject, such as more qualified professionals, is more substantial.
On the one hand, it is clear that the development of different skills or knowledge plays a crucial role in the creation of great specialists. However, this trend can result in the diminishing of focus in terms of the main subjects. For example, students who learn only math achieve better academic scores in a short time, rather than those who combine math with other extracurricular activities. In addition, there are alternative ways to combine the main subjects with the additional ones, such as attending extra courses or clubs. For instance, a student who wants to study a new language may apply for specific language classes.
On the other hand, focusing on one subject allows individuals to improve their skills and knowledge better. In particular, students will have more time to explore their main field profoundly, which subsequently leads to better career opportunities. For example, if a person wants to achieve the highest qualification, it is obvious that unnecessary university courses will consume his time.
In conclusion, although there is the advantage of learning different subjects, such as improvement of knowledge in a variety of fields, I strongly believe that enhancement of the qualification is more significant.