One movie I watched recently and would like to watch again is 12 on Green Man. It’s a classic counter-rune drama and fall into the legal. Although this just a black and white movie, it led me with a really strong impression. The film is about the discussion of 12 Zura about the murder case of a 9 year old boy. The debate begins to become tense when 11 people think that boy is guilty and there are no need to discuss. However, there is a Zura who thinks that it cannot be included. And this person presents evidence to prove the boy is a insurgent and this man has succeeded in convincing the remaining 11 people to vote for the boy innocent. The whole film takes place in the staff and room with increased drama of the film. I watched this film at home when a friend of mine introduced it and it’s really what I expected of one of the best movies of the old time. I really want to watch this film again because it created a simulation for the brain as well as tension in its development of the film. Each time Zura changes his mind, you learn something new about human nature and racism. Even though it’s what made in 1950, it still feels very relevant to today. Also, the performance, outstanding every character is distanced and the film manages to be incredibly self-sufficient despite the lack of the action or special effect. It’s a great example of how strong writing acting and direction can make a simple
Band 7+: Describe a movie you watched recently and would like to watch again You should say: What type of movie it was What it was about Where you watched it And explain why you would like to watch it again
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were submitted by one of our users.
69%
Accuracy
The overall pronunciation accuracy of your speech, reflecting how well a native speaker can comprehend it.
Polished transcript:
Male
Female
One movie I watched recently and would like to watch again is 12 Angry Men. It's a classic courtroom drama and falls into the legal genre. Although this is just a black and white movie, it left me with a really strong impression. The film is about the discussion of 12 jurors regarding the murder case of a 9-year-old boy. The debate becomes tense when 11 people think the boy is guilty and believe there is no need to discuss it. However, there is one juror who thinks that it cannot be concluded. This person presents evidence to prove the boy is innocent, and this man succeeds in convincing the remaining 11 people to vote for the boy's innocence. The whole film takes place in the jury room, which increases the drama of the film. I watched this film at home when a friend of mine introduced it, and it truly lived up to my expectations as one of the best movies of all time. I really want to watch this film again because it created a simulation for the brain as well as tension in its development. Each time a juror changes his mind, you learn something new about human nature and prejudice. Even though it was made in 1957, it still feels very relevant today. Also, the performances are outstanding; every character is distinct, and the film manages to be incredibly self-sufficient despite the lack of action or special effects. It's a great example of how strong writing, acting, and direction can make a simple story compelling.
Actual audio transcript (What native speakers are likely to hear):
Tips: Click on each word to see feedback.
Speaking Time: 104 seconds