Band 5+: Have you ever seen some old buildings in your city? Do you think we should keep old buildings in cities? Do you prefer living in an old building or a modern house? Are there any old buildings you want to see in the future? Why?

Your pronunciation is above average. However, you may find complexity in certain words challenging. Regular practice should aid in improvement.

The response is relevant to the questions, but lacks depth and detail. Consider expanding on your answers by providing more specific examples and elaborating on your opinions. Try to address all parts of the question more fully.

The answer is coherent and mostly fluent, although there are a few minor hesitations and slightly unnatural phrasing (e.g., "I have ever seen"). Improving fluency would involve smoother transitions between ideas and more natural sentence structures. The response directly addresses the first question but only partially addresses the others. Expanding on the reasons for preserving old buildings and expressing a preference for old buildings or modern houses would improve the score.

The vocabulary used is adequate and appropriate for the context. However, more precise and sophisticated vocabulary could enhance the response. For example, instead of "quite near," consider using "in close proximity to." Using more descriptive language to describe the buildings would also improve the lexical resource score.

The grammar is mostly accurate, with a few minor errors (e.g., tense inconsistencies). While the range of grammatical structures is sufficient, using more complex sentence structures and varied tenses would improve the score. For example, using passive voice or subordinate clauses would demonstrate a wider grammatical range.