Band 4+: the picture below shows the differencein the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025

The report effectively addresses the task by describing the main changes between 2010 and 2025. It provides a clear overall summary and highlights key differences, such as the relocation of the car park, the expansion of the hall, and the addition of new facilities. However, there are minor inaccuracies and omissions, such as the mention of 'consumers and businesses' which is not part of the original plan, and the lack of precise details about the locations of all new rooms. The report could also benefit from more specific comparative language and a more logical organization of information, but overall, it sufficiently covers the required content. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction and a concluding paragraph. However, the flow is sometimes disrupted by vague references (e.g., 'the other corner' without specifying which corner) and a slightly confusing final sentence. The use of cohesive devices is basic but effective, though more precise linking would improve clarity. Consider organizing the description more logically, perhaps by describing each section of the layout in a systematic order, and using clearer signposting to guide the reader.

There is a reasonable range of vocabulary related to layout and changes (e.g., 'replaced', 'expanded', 'attached'), but the report suffers from imprecise and awkward phrasing (e.g., 'consumers and businesses' is unclear and inappropriate for a layout task). Some collocations are unnatural (e.g., 'room were add'). To improve, focus on using accurate and varied vocabulary for describing locations and transformations, and avoid vague terms. Ensure that all terms are used in the correct context.

The report attempts to use a range of structures but contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity (e.g., 'car park moved' should be 'the car park moved'; 'were add' should be 'were added'; missing articles). Punctuation is also inconsistent. To improve, pay close attention to subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and article usage. Practice constructing more complex sentences with subordination to demonstrate greater grammatical control.