Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: The pie charts show the results of a survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates asked about the range of books and non-printed materials in their library.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The pie charts show the results of a survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates asked about the range of books and non-printed materials in their library.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image presents four pie charts divided into two sections: "Range of books" ("Print materials") and "Range of non-printed materials" ("Non - print materials"), each evaluated across three categories: "Very good", "Satisfaction", and "Not good" by "Undergraduate" and "Postgraduate" cohorts. Under "Range of books", the "Undergraduate" chart reports: Very good at 37%, Satisfaction at 35%, and Not good at 28%; the "Postgraduate" chart reports: Very good at 22%, Satisfaction at 28%, and Not good at 50%. Under "Range of non-printed materials", the "Undergraduate" chart shows: Very good at 68%, Satisfaction at 20%, and Not good at 12%; the "Postgraduate" chart shows: Very good at 12%, Satisfaction at 22%, and Not good at 62%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The pie charts represent the results of a questionnaire in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the variety of books and non-printed materials in their school library.

Overall, most of postgraduates were evaluated the range of books as very good while the percentage for undergraduates were half those of all respondents in each of the three categories. With regard to the percentages of postgraduates who rated non-printed materials as not good while undergraduates rates it as very good.

To begin with, undergraduates and postgraduates rated the range of books in three categories: very good, satisfactory, and not good. Only 28% of undergraduates considered the range of books unsatisfactory, compared with 50% of postgraduates. Moreover, 37% of undergraduates rated the range of books as very good, whereas the corresponding figure for postgraduates was considerably lower, at 22%. Meanwhile, 35% of postgraduates were satisfied with the range of books, compared with only 28% of undergraduates.

Turning to the range of non-printed materials, the most noticeable feature is that the ratings given by postgraduates and undergraduates were almost opposite. While 62% of postgraduates rated non-printed materials as not good, 68% of undergraduates considered them very good. Moreover, the percentages of undergraduates who rated these materials as either very good or not good were identical, at 12% in each category. Additionally, 22% of postgraduates were satisfied with this option, compared with 20% of undergraduates, representing a difference of just two percentage points.

Word Count: 239

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C2 - Complex
Continue to challenge and refine your language choices.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

undergraduates: 10

postgraduates: 10

books: 6

range: 6

materials: 5

rated: 5

non-printed: 4

while: 3

compared: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by describing the main trends and comparing the two groups across the four charts. The overall structure is clear, with a brief introduction, an overview, and detailed paragraphs for each material type. However, there are a few inaccuracies and omissions: the overview incorrectly states that postgraduates rated books as 'very good' (the data shows the opposite), and the statement about undergraduates' percentages being 'half those of all respondents' is unclear and not supported by the data. Additionally, the report misstates the satisfaction figures for books (35% for postgraduates vs. 28% for undergraduates, but the data shows 28% for postgraduates and 35% for undergraduates). For non-printed materials, the report incorrectly claims that undergraduates' 'very good' and 'not good' percentages were identical at 12% (the data shows 68% and 12%, respectively). To improve, ensure the overview accurately reflects the main trends and double-check all data points for accuracy. The report could also benefit from more precise language in the overview to avoid ambiguity.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with clear paragraphing for each type of material. The overall message can be followed, but there are some minor lapses in cohesion. For example, the overview paragraph contains a confusing sentence: 'most of postgraduates were evaluated the range of books as very good while the percentage for undergraduates were half those of all respondents in each of the three categories.' This sentence is unclear and does not accurately summarize the data. Additionally, the second sentence of the overview is incomplete and lacks a main verb. To improve, ensure the overview is concise and accurately reflects the main trends, and use cohesive devices to link ideas smoothly.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a good range of vocabulary appropriate for the task, such as 'rated', 'considered', 'corresponding figure', 'noticeable feature', and 'representing a difference'. There is some repetition of 'rated' and 'range of books', but overall the lexical resource is adequate. To improve, try to use more varied synonyms and precise terms, such as 'evaluated', 'assessed', 'proportion', 'percentage', and 'category'. Also, avoid informal or awkward phrasing like 'rates it as very good' in the overview. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including comparative forms, passive voice, and complex sentences. However, there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings that affect clarity. For example, 'most of postgraduates were evaluated the range of books as very good' should be 'most postgraduates evaluated the range of books as very good' or 'the range of books was evaluated as very good by most postgraduates'. Also, 'the percentage for undergraduates were half those of all respondents' has subject-verb agreement issues. The sentence 'With regard to the percentages of postgraduates who rated non-printed materials as not good while undergraduates rates it as very good' is incomplete and contains a subject-verb agreement error ('rates' should be 'rated'). To improve, proofread for subject-verb agreement, ensure all sentences are complete, and use a variety of complex structures accurately.

The three charts below show the value in Australian dollars of Australian trade with three different countries from 2004 to 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

The three line graphs illustrate Australia’s imports from and exports to China, Japan, and the United States between 2004 and 2009. Overall, trade with China increased steadily in both imports and exports, whereas exports to Japan fluctuated and imports were constant. Trade with the United States was relatively stable, with imports remaining higher than exports […]

Band 7+

The chart shows how many men and women went to the cinema to watch different types of films in the year 2018. The pie chart gives information about the age of cinemagoers.

This report examines male’s and female’s attendance at a cinema depending on the types that are shown there and age of cinemagoers who are interested in show. Looking at the first diagram, we can see that women prefer watching Action and Romcom a little less in comparison with men. At the same time, women tend […]

Band 5+

The pie chart and the line graph shows the workforce and the unemployment in Australia from 1996 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. (Mixed Charts)

The pie chart and line graph illustrate the workforce and unemployment rates by region of birth in Australia from 1996 to 2003. Overall, Australian-born workers held the largest share of the workforce, while those born in non-English-speaking countries had the smallest share. Moreover, unemployment in Australia experienced a significant decline over the period. In detail, […]

Band 7+

See All

Band 7+: The pie charts show the results of a survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates asked about the range of books and non-printed materials in their library.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

The three charts below show the value in Australian dollars of Australian trade with three different countries from 2004 to 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

The pie chart below represents the main reasons why Agricultural land becomes less productive. The bar chart show how these causes affected three regions of the world in the 1990s. Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart below represents the main reasons why Agricultural land becomes less productive. The bar chart show how these causes affected three regions of the world in the 1990s. Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart shows how many men and women went to the cinema to watch different types of films in the year 2018. The pie chart gives information about the age of cinemagoers.

The pie chart and the line graph shows the workforce and the unemployment in Australia from 1996 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. (Mixed Charts)

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium