Vehicles utilizing fossil fuels ought to be banned and electric transportation ought to replace them. I agree with this statement because electric cars are more environmentally friendly and driving them costs less.
To begin with, vehicles that use electricity to move are better for nature than cars that burn fossil fuels. This is due to the fact that fossil fuels emit harmful gasses, such as CO2, into the air, which, in turn, leads to further increases in climate change by damaging the ozone layer curbing the ultraviolet lights. Electric cars, on the other hand, do not release any greenhouse gas emissions since they usually utilize natural electricity to move, not damaging the environment we live. Tesla cars, for example, are designed to get electricity power from the sunlight, which makes them more environmentally friendly vehicles compared to traditional means of transport.
Furthermore, using electric mean of transport can be more inexpensive compared to a traditional car. This is because fossil fuels, especially petroleum and gasoline, are limited, forcing drivers to spend more expenses. However, electricity is unlimited since it comes from the sun or the wind, thereby charging much cheaper than petroleum and gasoline. To illustrate, in many parts of the world, oil cost has been increasing as the limits is decreasing. That is why the vast majority of drivers own Tesla cars to save up their income.
In conclusion, I agree that cars burning fossil fuels should be replaced by electric vehicles because they are not as harmful to nature as cars using fossil fuels are, and electricity coming from natural ways costs less to drive than using oil or gasoline.
