In the contemporary world the quantity of vehicles have escalated, this situation have led to the fundings of road systems. There are controversial perspectives about this, for example some say that the state is responsible to the conditions of roadway, meanwhile others’ predilection is its drivers’ obligation. This essay will elaborate on these two opinions and will provide my point of view.
To commence, proponents who encourage the idea which incorporates the authorities’ responsibility to subsidize the street have their own reasons. Since, the growth of cars still persists, the narrow roads that is inconvenient to drive ought to be expanded by government and this requires a lot of money indeed. Due to this, tax is inevitable. Every individual give tiny percentage of their salary to the state and the variety of public works as well as services namely, schools and roads obtain benefits from it. Moreover, this method is more profitable for both sides as not solely the private drivers utilize the roadway but also, ordinary citizens to go to work or hang out with their allies.
On the other hand, if the vehicle machines’ number is in its peak, then the turmoil among people probably will occur. Due to this, it can inflict a huge pressure on individual and the state itself. Therefore, funds of drivers can be worthy. For instance, ratio between time of driving and desired money may be introduced. To be more precisely, the bills should be gained from the spent hours in the road. It can alleviate the chaos, coupled with reducing the exacerbated contamination which is caused through cars.
In conclusion, measures should be taken about these contradictory perspectives, however in my opinion the former is more coherent.