The debate surrounding children have freedom to do thier own activities in leisure time rather forcing them to do organized activities by parents has been a topic of contention. Proponents of children’s freedom of playing argue that the advantages associated with the foster of creativity and the growth of emotional intellegent and intellectual intellegent. Conversely, others believe childrens should be managed to follow scheduled activities during the playtime, avoiding the risks associated with violance attachment and game addiction for a long time. This essay will critically exminate both of perspectives before presenting a well-balanced conclusion.
Advocates of children having freedom to play what they favour asserts that the freedoom choice plays a crucial role in nurtuting the creativity and fostering mental growth associated with IQ & EQ for childrens. Childrens have a capability of learning and imitiating things that they learn so quickly, hence, they can easily conquer the creativity of creating new things. For example, young kids can use thier own imagination to draw picture or thing that they’ve not ever seen it before. A research shows that the more young people are, the more quick they learn, which applied for a children. When a kids is growing up with thier own creative world, they can be triggered with the different fantansies and creations in thier mind, which indicates the higher level of creativity of a kid compared to the alduts. These factors not only contribute to the higher creative side , but also embrace higher chance of both EQ&IQ development system for childrens.
However, critcis argue that letting children to decide thier own playing methods can lead to the risk of mental violance and game addiction. With the development of Internet and social platform, childrens can easily access to those flims or games associated with high level of violence without partental supervision when they’re playing in thier own time, leading a replication of courses of violence actions. Young kids, in particurlar, can potentially harm themself or others unconciously as they follow the ferocity actions in the film or game.
Beyond violence thread, delegating a freedom for kids could turn them into game addictor. They will focus on playing game all day rather than spending time on their schooling, led by the fascination of game-playing indulgence. Addictive game players, in particularly, can ask for thier parents to buy tem virtual goods or stuffs in the game which costs the parents a certain amount of money. Also, they will get angry if they’re not financially supported in this way by the family, which poses the emerging riks of becoming robbers or stealers when these kids are getting older, hence contribution to negative impact on the well-being of individuals and society of a country.
In conclusion, allowing kids to have freedoom to choose what they’re interested in playing presents some violence-ralated mentality and risk of stealing perents money, but it may restricts the ablity to develop the creativity and thinking mindset for kids. Kids should be taught to know which is suitable for thier playing time and also supporting thier mental and physical development. The recommened approach is building kids a smart playing-mix-schooling agenda , so that they can better act responsibly and appropriatedly. Hence, childers will have a good & safe enviroment to learn and play, avoiding unexpeted risks in terms of brutal and illegal actions in the future. As parents, in specifically, should imply rules on thier own childern and oftern manage to look after thier children when they’re playing. Finding equilibrium between personal growth and.parental supervision is crucial for a successful transition for kids to grow up as an outstanding individuals.