In the contemporary era, population tends to grow up rapidly, whereas the land for living are remaining same. To mitigate the additional living problem, many countries decided to replace parks with housing to met up increasing population levels while some people argue that the space should use as a park. In my point of view, I totally disagree with this statement because parks are more important for relaxation and socialization. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will discuss the reasons behind my viewpoint.
To begin with, regarding the advantages of the park, most parks are situated in the centre of the city because of it is a way to unwind after a long tiring week or a park is a perfect place to start a day with jogging. For instance, In Thailand, there are numerous parks, they uses parks as a recreational spots where they can throw picnics and can spend quality time with their love ones. Therefore, people are spending time together, being socialize with each other and also helps to strength the internal bond of a family. Additionally, children can enjoy outdoor activities which is beneficial for their health.
On the other hand, those who think that parks can be replaced with housing to met the additional population levels. It is not the correct way because eliminating parks can cause the increase of carbon emissions and can increase our global warming. That is why we must find out some alternative ways like instead of replacing parks with housing, people should build high rise buildings. For example, Singapore is one of the most significant countries to learn about. They re-arranged their small space and still have greenery parks in the centre of the city
In conclusion, while the population is raising day by day, there are many alternative ways to solve this problem instead of removing parks. Moreover, the advantages of parks outweighs the disadvantages. Hence, I absolutely disagree with this statement.