In contemporary times, the authorities are providing greater assistance to people working in the artistic realm. Despite their financial commitments towards cultivating artists, there is debate over whether funding should be directed towards other government sectors, such as healthcare and education. I partially agree that money should be ploughed into the public sectors, and in this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument.
To begin with, healthcare and education are imperative government sectors which need to be invested in to help a nation function effectively. If these sectors are underfunded, it can have dire consequences on people’s health and education and reduce the human development index. The reduction in quality of life will mean that the economy of a country may be detrimentally impacted. Ultimately, this would reduce the funds available for other government sectors, including the arts.
However, if more money is invested in the arts, this could lead to the creation of professionals who can help enhance the economy. For instance, artists have creative cognitive abilities and pertinent skills to create opportunities to grow the economy. Consequently, this growth can help develop the healthcare and education sectors.
In conclusion, healthcare and education are vital sectors which require substantial funding to ensure a nation functions effectively and its citizens enjoy a good quality of life. Nevertheless, investing in the arts can also be beneficial, as artists possess creative abilities that can stimulate economic growth, which in turn may generate more funds for public services. Therefore, I believe that governments should prioritise healthcare and education, while still allocating a reasonable proportion of their budget to the arts so that both areas can flourish.