In the past, when there was a lack of economy, people lived in small villages, vert crowded. Nowadays, most of people live in a better wat and because of the economic changes, there are almost no people living in small villages like in the past. Also mention the pros and cons of people living in small villages in the past.
I believe there were two main benefits. Firstly, by living in a small village, they know everyone who lived there and became close like relatives. The advantage of being in a close relationship with many humans is that you are never alone and you don’t have to ask anyone for help when you need it. Secondly, learning from childhood in a small village in harsh life means setting the threshold for a person’s future life. Happiness and pain are equal, so the more a person suffers, the more they can achieve their desired goal and success. That’s why if you grow up well-educated from childhood, you can acquire enough skills to survive no matter what hardships you face.
I think many of the disadvantages were financial. Firstly, the children were lagging behind modern developments. Also, the lack of knowledge of social media is a serious drawback compared to nowaday’s youngsters. Also, it must have seemed like a futile dream to go abroad without knowing the highly developed area. Children who are afraid to dream big because they don’t have money have lived in our past. But there are many people who didn’t give up because of lack of money and worked very hard to succeed.
In my opinion, no matter where a person lives, If he is grateful for everything he has and tries harder, there is nothing he cannot achieve. Therefore, contrasted to children living in prosperous urban areas and children living in poor small communities, youngsters from small communities are more resilient. However, urban children are easily discouraged, but due to modern development, they have advantages or more than youngsters in small communities.