In this globalization era to recognize their sens of self and protect their cultural heritage have become a disputable subject matter. Some believe that it is more significant for young learners to qualify about community history than international history. I agree with this statement up to a point, and I should also highlight the fact that ignorance of global history has a negative impact on global worldview and makes communication with other nations difficult.
On the one hand, there are some justifications to support this idea. The first and perhaps the most significant reason is that it helps us understand our identity because local old information helps students understand their own cultural roots, and tradations. For example, knowing about historica events and ancestors. The second reason is that easier to understand for young learners because of their brains is so fresh than old people. For instance they quickly memorize all events and incidents
On the other hand, I do not accept this nation due to the following clws. The principal key point is that intarnational history helps us for working with foreigner. To exemplity if children do not learn world history, they may struggle to communicate with people from other countries.Another factor is that encourages tolerance and global cultural awareness due to the fact that world history shapes a broader worldview. For example it creats encourages tolerance and culture understanding among of students.
In conclusion, with the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that it is easy for young people and global history helps us for working with people from other country should be equally taken into account because of their huge benefits for the development of both individuals and society.