Some people think that governments should prioritize economic growth, while others argue that protecting the surroundings should be the greater priority. Both views are probably right because when the economic growth is good then we can protect the environment whatever we want. However, if nature and surroundings are good then we don’t have to spend much money on our health and that can reduce our anxiety and stress.
On a one hand, economic growth is providing basic need that we have and that can making job creation for example if we have enough money there is so many company and jobs appeared but we don’t have that much of plenty finance we need to layoff the people who works. Moreover, if governments prioritize economic growth, public services would be free and communities can live high living standards.For instance ministries pay their health and public transportations fee and public just pay their own tax and it would change our lifestyle when jobs created the sustainability will be more clean and organized.
On the other hand, Those who support greater investment in environmental protection argue that climate change poses a serious threat to both humans and wildlife. Rising global temperatures have contributed to more frequent floods, droughts and other extreme weather events, resulting in the destruction of ecosystems and property. Therefore, governments should invest in renewable energy, stricter environmental regulations and conservation projects to reduce carbon emissions and protect natural resources for future generations.
In conclusion, although environmental protection should remain a major priority, I believe governments should strike a balance between protecting the environment and promoting economic growth, as both are essential for sustainable national development.