I completely agree that our culture site’s should be preserved for tourism and educational proposes.
There are several reasons why we conserve old heritage because it make our cities look more beautiful and attractive and as a result foreign tourists will come to visit these monuments which ultimately boot country economy. For example united kindom has preserved historical buildings and sculpture which attracts alot of visitors each year from all around the world and uk is generating high revenue from tourism industry. Secondly these historical heritage create bussiness opportunities for local people, which make them financially strong and uplift their living standards. Additionally, earning from tourism can be spent on the maintenance of old buildings and other important concerns that are vital soomth functioning of country like education, health and infrastructure and security.
Secondly, it is curial that we educate our young generation about our forefathers who they lived and worked this is only possible when we have been preserved our cultural buildings. Although conversations will teach us about the way of living of our ancestors but we also can learn lesson from their mistakes that would help us to develop more precise strategies to tackle problems. In my opinion we must protect our historical heritage that will play povital role in uplift of economic and job creation for local and also teach our upcoming generation about our history background.
To conclude that, although perservation of old buildings boot out economy but also it is the best way to tell our new generation about our past and we can learn valuable things from it.