There is a need for creating a universal language according to some. While it could strengthen relationships between people regardless of distinct nationalities and provide better educational opportunities, it is actually likely to cause cultural losses and be impossible to promulgate across each part of Earth, meaning that the disadvantages overwhelmingly outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, the invention of a language for international communication may bring together individuals with cultural differences. It is an undeniable fact that humanity often encounters social obstacles, such as language barriers, in uniting; even though the technological advancements have facilitated interactions, these obstacles persist because translators are not often accurate, and AI tools can be inconvenient to use. However, these issues can be simply avoided by the creation of a language that would be used globally, making it possible for a majority of people to socialize despite residing in various countries and belonging to diverse cultures. This easier socialization additionally can lead to a greater exchange of knowledge. Students worldwide would have an opportunity to study abroad, particularly in prestigious universities, where the level of education is much higher and more advanced, enabling them to develop their countries and share knowledge with others.
On the other hand, inventing a single language may well put end for other languages and cultures. Undoubtedly, different cultures bring unique ways of thinking, traditions and problem-solving approaches, fostering people to learn from another’s experiences and viewpoints. But if there were only one language, people would be limited in terms of creativity and problem-solving skills, and even they are likely to lose the sense of belonging, which provides a foundation of social connection, allowing us to feel accepted, valued and supported by others. Furthermore, this idea – to create one global language – tends to fail because a language, called Esperanto, that was created for international communication has already faced a failure. People often significantly value their own culture, and therefore, they can be stubborn for learning and prioritizing other languages.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the benefits of the advice to made single universal language are dwarfed compared to the downsides of it. Also, this recommendation seems to be unreliable and there is a high likelihood of failure.