So, no one argue that the parental influence is important to all children. Some of them spend literally all their free time with family. However, It is not means that others should spend their full free time with family.
On the one hand, children has to spend their free time with family. Because it is very important occupation for parents. Therefore, they will be safety with the close people in their environment. For instance, in the middle century teenagers spent their free time with family when they as possible as have free time. Due to they were intelligence, well-mannered and so on. For example people like Al Horesmi. He was an Arabic polymath, smart person.
On the other hand, individuals have to live separately. Because, it plays a big role in child’s developing, growing life. For example, people who live with parents do not mostly earning money for themselves and shack their life with parents doing nothing useful. Almost all the people who live separately have a successful life, have a well payed job and so on. All this aspects is real if people doing self-development and be independent.
To conclude, I tend to support second side which includes more advantages that in first statement. I totally agree that children should not spend all of their free time with their family.