As many nations evolve to meet modern demands, the question of whether authorities should allocate money to develop public transportation or enhance overall infrastructure has become increasingly debated. While some claim that enhancing public transportation reduces levels of congestion, others argue that wider roads are a better option to invest in. This essay will explore both perspectives before concluding that advanced public transportation is a contributing factor to the quality of roads and infrastructure in general.
Supporters of improving modes of public transportation, such as buses, often argue that they are very important to be developed, as they present the vast majority of vehicles found on roads. If, for example, the number of buses were increased, they could circulate faster. That is to say, buses would be less crowded during the peak hours because passengers will not have to wait for them to arrive as slowly as they usually do. Thus, many believe that funding the development of those could significantly ease individuals’ routines, in terms of movement.
On the other hand, many argue that the extension of highways and roads is vital for tackling traffic. People could reach their destinations much faster if, during the peak hours, there were no traffic jams. Roundabouts, for instance, are more effective compared to other types of roads, as they are unique in terms of form, and they do not tend to cause hesitations. Yet, this cannot completely deal with the core problem, as majority of individuals will still opt for public transport rather than their vehicles, mainly because many just do not own theirs. For these reasons, enhanced infrastructure is viewed as secondary factor rather than mainly driving one.
In conclusion, although improving the quality of roads may slightly reduce the issue’s impact, it risks overlooking the main reason why problems on roads occur. Therefore, I firmly believe that governments should opt out of that idea and invest in more vivid and cost-effective projects.