In this contemporary era, ubiquitous flights has been booked everyday. Many individuals believe that the repetitive flight should be reduced or restricted completely due to detrimental effect of plane on the ecosystem. This essay strongly disagrees with this point and clarify the reason why I oppose with this view.
Regarding to disadvantages, the airplane causes air pollution which damages its environment. To illustrate, the 2022 statistic of air pollution illustrates that usage of aircraft emit half of the total polluted air. However, even tough detrimental effect is significant, its usage has multiple benefits. Firstly, international meeting excluding online meeting, predominantly require individuals to gather at one specific nations location. Therefore, it will consume and delay numerous days just to participate in any meetings hosted by other country without flying. According to Mongolian Airline Statistics Center, for instance, 99 percent of international conference members often rapidly use air transportation, estimating over 40 million passengers annually. This information confirms that airplane plays crucial role in global relations.
Furthermore, other paths to cross country border including ship or train requires innumerable hours to reach other nation due to slower speed rate compared to flying. For example, average train took minimum 1 days to reach the bordering country while plane took maximum several hour. Likewise, using ship is significantly slower and risky compared to other alternatives to cross border like train owing to the fact that the oceans complicated features such as wind speed, that are difficult to examine whether it is safe or dangerous. As a consequence, tickets are highly prone to be postponed, making the passenger unavailable to participate in crucial meetings. In contrast, airplane has more predictable safety with the malfunction rate of 0.2 percentage while other paths have at least 2 percent failure proportion.
In conclusion, despite the considerable negative environmental imp