In recent years, the environmental problems about polution attract a large attention around the world. Therefore, a part of people decide to decline the number of times they transport by airplanes every year, and some of them even give up using this transportation totally. It might cause a huge argument about whether the advantage of this ways will exceed the shortcomings for individuals and businesses. In my openion, I prefer to agree that the shortbacks might overwheel the good sides.
First of all, the drop of fly times may truely be beneficial to reducing the polution. When planes fly, they will emit a lot of carbon dioxide or other gases, which extremly damage the atmosphere and continue to enhance the global warming. Therefore, some passengers determine to stop flying, and they think that it can reduce the emmision of carbon dioxide, facinating environmental improvemnets.
However, they consider only one side of this issue, and overlook the shorts of this way. If everyone are blind to follow it, the technology and science might be undermined, and more likely to go back to the previous standard. By this way, one person can’t arrive at distant destinations rapidly without using the plane, because other transportations are really slow, which will waste our time and energy on the way. Besides, with the number of these people growing, the flight companies are more likely to facing a difficult problem, their clients are declining obviously, which will influence their economy and a lot of employees might be fired. Overall, I think that we can protect our environment by other moderate ways rather than this.