Many people assume that governments should invest more in education rather than arts. I partially agree with this opinion. While education plays a crucial role in developing of the country, it should be developed not by reducing the art industry
Decreasing financial support towards the art industry would have a negative impact on social and cultural institution as it maintains the art industry and enhances the cultural values of people. Institutions like museum and art galleries would have a reduced budget and subsequently, less opportunities to encourage people to attend these places. This may lead to a diminish of people that Moreover, government may profit from the regular art galleries and events, which also have a several works that may influence the individuals in different ways, including the national perception. For instance, the technological museum in Astana contains a several art directions including national works from the generational artists of Kazakhstan.
However, education plays a crucial role in the developing of the country by producing the huge number of experts and governmental workers, that would profit the country and equal the hopes and spendings. To explain briefly, more educational citizens have several opportunities to build up a career and that could benefit the government significantly. Another point to consider is the significance of education on society, that may help the country by decreasing the unemployment level in the future.
To conclude, government should spent more money on education without reducing a budget to the arts for making a creative and educated society at the same time, that will benefit the country in the future.