Opinions are divided on whether destitution could be more efficiently removed with financial aid or workplace skills development. While some people think that giving extra money for people facing economical hardships could easily reduce poverty, I disagree with this statement because the government can spend money on decreasing the level of deprivation.
Giving welfare payments to the economically vulnerable isn’t a way of reducing the problem of poverty. If the government gave money to disadvantaged families, they wouldn’t have a motivation to try to get professional skills and find a job. Although extra payments can help to cover basic needs such as food and clothing, they do not provide long-term, sustainable solution to penury. For instance, many welfare programs that offer unconditional cash transfers fail to lift people out of poverty because the money is spent on immediate consumption rather than future development. Consequently, social payments do not create financial independence.
However, many scientists believe that a more sustainable approach to tackling destitution lies in education and job training. Investing in people’s development empowers individuals by providing them with the practical skills and knowledge needed to get stable employment. This method could help unprivileged citizens to become more competitive on the job market. Therefore, rather than giving free money to people with low income and reducing their motivation to get highly paid work, the government should help them with getting matched with current labour market demands.
In conclusion, direct financial aid does not reduce root cause of the problem of deprivation. As I am concerned, state investment in education is the remedy for destitution.