In this digital age, the rise of e-book wrangles about the future of traditional books. While proponents of paper books argue that digital books hold value, others contend that paper books are completely replaced by digital books. This essay discusses both viewpoints before presenting my own views.
On the one hand, digital books have tangible benefits that make them a preferred choice for the many readers. Firstly, they are highly convenient, you will take it anywhere and compact you have to put all your books in it. Secondly, digital books are easily assessable, whenever you need them, you have read them, while during lecture, or you need a quick review of any specific topic, adjust font and size during reading and dictionaries facility is also available that enhance reading experience. Thirdly, digitals books are more affordable in terms of cost because it has not included any extra charges like printing papers etc. As a result, digital books are preferred for cost-effectiveness, and accessibility will lead to gradually decline printed books.
On the other hand, critics of e-books believe that printed books can never reduce their worth because of their uniqueness. Many people enjoy learning physical books, they were able to visualize the story that takes them zone out of this real world, flipping pages while reading and the smell of books will never be replaced. Furthermore, paper books are easily accessible all the time if you don’t have any internet connection. Due to excessive use of screening, people are prone to eye strain or different eye ailments. Consequently, due to this severe reason people ought to be refrained from digital books.
In conclusion, both views are valued in their own ways. If we go on the balance approach, we get more benefits. While e-books are getting popularity for its advanced features, contrast, its paper book can never be replaced because of its irreplaceable sensory that many readers will cherish this.