It is widely argued whether healthcare system should be dominated by private businesses or non-profit organisations. From my point of view, although the former has multiple benefits, I firmly believe that people ought to be taken care mainly by public medical companies.
To begin with, profit-making healthcare services are beneficial in some ways. Notably, such services are often well-equipped with breakthrough technologies, such as specialized equipment, and decent facilities for patients. Moreover, patients who choose private companies may be provided with personalized treatment as the number of patients in those tend to be inconsiderable. In addition, more experts with specialized skills, knowledge and high-quality qualifications might be attracted to work in these companies due to high levels of compensation. Consequently, patients might have better conditions to cope with disease, especially serious ones; for example, cancer or heart problems.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that the disadvantages of profit-making medical system eclipsed its advantages for various reasons. Particularly, the cost in these institutions can be extremely expensive and unaffordable to many people, especially those who come from the lower class of the society. This may result in the reduction in the quantity of people who can to access and approach the healthcare services needed. Additionally, some private medical businesses might ignore the rights and benefits of the majority of people to achieve the highest earning, causing unfairness and inequality among people from different classes and widen the gap between the poors and the wealthy.
In conclusion, despite the merits of profit-making medical systems, I support the idea that public healthcare institutions should be in charge of taking care of people in the society.