It is often argued that state authorities should provides financial aid to artists, while others claim that artists should be responsible for covering their financial needs. I totally agree that governments should subsidise painters, musicians and writers, as it leads to cultivation of art and equal opportunities for every artist.
One key reason for supporting this view is that supplying artists with financial resources ensures the development of art. This is largely because, an additional aid can help creative individuals, who usually lacked in a special equipment and professional tools, to create their art objects without any limits. For instance, funded support and scholarships by government provides an opportunity for artists to purchase high-quality materials and tools, enabling them to work in full potential and foster the cultivation of art.
Another important consideration is that subsidies for painters and musicians creates equal opportunities for every individual. In practice, this means that people despite their backgrounds can realize their creative potential. Although some argue that this artists should be responsible for earning their own living, I suggest that they do not have a capacity to cover their expenses. To explain, the art market is highly unpredictable and volatile, meaning that it is very important to support artists. As a result, providing a financial support allows individuals to focus on creating art objects without the constant financial pressure .
In conclusion, I firmly believe that government should provide financial support to artists such as painters, musicians and writers. By giving them an additional aid, this approach ultimately leads to long-term cultivation of art.