Many claim that the state budget should be poured into assisting cultural practices such as music, theater, or art, while others believe this is a financial loss. The latter opinion may exert several justifications; however, I am in agreement with the latter.
Those who state that it is a waste of money to invest in promoting cultural activities often follow some reasons. The most intrinsic and inhenrent of them is the limitation of these persuits to yield practical benefits for the public. Irrefutably, music festivals and art exhibitions often cost a huge amount of government budget to be established but find it challenging to generate tangible advantages to the residents compared to other sectors such as education and healthcare system, the investment of which are more likely to offer the public directly fruitful results, hence, rendering money spent for entertaining activities a financial detriment for society.
Conversely, the opposing faction also has a multitude of justifications for national expenditure in culture promotion. One primary reason is the improvement of public well-being through cultural activities. Indubitably, entertainment plays a crucial role in bolstering individuals’ mental health as it helps them relieve stress and depression, especially in this ever-changing and stressful era, resultantly, which can presumably translate into an augmentation in efficiency and productivity at work or school, ergo, contributing to the societal improvement. Moreover, these cultural practices can likely act as a powerful tool to showcase a country’s cultural richness to others, thus, fostering a flourishing tourism industry and generating financial stability for the public.
In conclusion, although allocating state investment into cultural activities aid may offer a limited range of benefits in comparison with other essential sectors, I believe it is worth encouraging this financial support thanks to its merits in enhancing people’s fulfillment and sustainably economic contribution to the country.