In today’s world, the issue of financial support to artists, musicians and poets has sparked considerable debate. While some argue that governments should give financial support to artists, musicians and poets, others contend that it is a waste of money. This essay will explore both perspectives and give my own opinion.
On the one hand, it is true that governments should give financial support to artists, musicians and poets because the works of art created by artists, musicians and poets also carry spiritual values, helping people work more effectively, thereby improving quality and contributing to economic development. Therefore, financial investment in them is an investment in the development of society and the country. Besides, art and music products help connect people together. Example, many people still use music to concentrate on work or look at pictures to reduce stress.
On the other hand, financial support to artists, musicians and poets is a waste of money. Our country still has many issues that need investment such as roads, factories, schools… to develop society and economy. Therefore, financial support to artists, musicians and poets is not necessary, it is directly contribute to social development.
In conclusion, the discussion surrounding financial support for artists, musicians, and poets presents compelling points from both perspectives. While there are clear advantages to government financial support for artists, musicians, and poets, there are also significant considerations that this support is a waste of money. Whether you agree or disagree, I think it is important to consider all perspectives before forming a final opinion.