The topic of zoos has generated a number of debates. While some people argue zoos are unnecessary and should be removed, others mention zoos can be a function for extinct of animals. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives, and provide my opinion.
On the one hand, those who consider zoos should be closed down believe that animals should live in wild life. The world of nature can exist with wild animals and natural greens. If some animals are taken by zookeepers, the chain of nature would be broken. For example, due to a giant panda from China spending his life at a zoo in Tokyo, some insects which basically eaten by pandas may be redundant. Furthermore, living at a zoo may effect mental health for some animals.
On the other hand, there is another perspective, which animals should be preserved by zoos. Some animals facing to be extintion could keep in a zoo if there would be some help by feeding them and controlling their room. Nowadays, due to the global warming and deforesting, some animals cannot endure to live with full energy. Comparing to this, all of animals can comfortably be spent their life based on their favor.
In conclusion, zoos have both sides of perspecitve which should be removed and should help some animals. Animals can survive with humal help at a zoo or in nature without any help. In my opinion, the best thing for all of animals would be spending in a wild life. In order to emplement this, people should pay more attention to keep environment for nature.