It is often debated whether the ideal way to offer adequate housing in metropolises is to construct high-rise residential buildings. I completely agree with this view because it is the most affordable approach.
On the one hand, there is a clear argument in favor of building tall apartment blocks in modern metropolises. To be specific, vertical development is an economical way for governments in order to provide sufficient housing for residents. A good example of this is a recent study by Uzbek researchers: they compared building low-level apartments with high-risebuildings. They found that the first option required significant amounts of urban land and led to urban sprawl. Consequently, this can lead to the loss of agricultural land and green spaces, which would result in elevated greenhouse gas emissions.
On the other hand, another crucial reason to support this idea is property prices. This means that the price of a house in tall apartment blocks can seem more affordable to residents of urban centers than in horizontal housing developments. A prime example of this is Xon Saroy, which is located in Sergeli, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. They offer budget-friendly houses for the public in high-density apartments, and they build them without overusing urban land. Therefore, it is evident that constructing such buildings is the more pragmatic approach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that developing tower blocks in metropolitan areas is the most viable solution to provide enough housing. This is because of its environmentally friendly approach and affordability for both governments and their residents.