A highly contentious issue these days relates to whether libraries should focus on providing books to the public or if they should also offer electronic materials such as computer software, videos, and DVDs. Some argue that providing these electronic resources is a misuse of resources and space, particularly for libraries with limited capacities. I am on the verge of exploring this trend from both points of view, and while I understand the arguments on either side, I firmly disagree with the notion that libraries should refrain from offering high-tech media. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both perspectives thoroughly.
On one hand, there is a group of people who believe that libraries should prioritize providing traditional books to the public. They argue that the allocation of resources toward electronic data is a waste for libraries with limited means. The principal reason for this viewpoint is that setting up and maintaining modern media equipment can be very expensive, potentially straining local or national budgets. For instance, a study published by BBC News found that 42% of local residents cannot afford to access public libraries due to the high costs of materials.
On the other hand, another group supports the idea of libraries offering electronic sources, as they provide numerous conveniences for users. The first and foremost advantage is that having access to the internet allows users to find various types of information, which can be incredibly helpful for students or professionals looking to expand their knowledge. For example, according to The Guardian in the United Kingdom, 72% of students prefer to study using computer-based learning, as they can easily search for what they want to read and access information with just one click.
To recapitulate, in light of my explanation, I would like to reiterate that I completely side with the viewpoint that libraries should embrace electronic resources alongside traditional books. I believe that my arguments support this opinion, and there is no longer a need for further discussion on this matter.