There is no doubt that the popularity of social networking sites has resulted in a plummet of real world interaction. Though there are certain upsides as well as downsides, I would advocate for the drawbacks to be of greater significance.
Regarding the merits of the reduction in face-to-face connection, one can see that the phenomenon would lessen the hassle of discoursing in real time when it can be achieved with relative ease via online meetings. Additionally, numerous individuals must face the anxiety of discussing matters directly with another person, notably someone who holds power over them, the surge in prevelancy of the Internet might remedy this problem. To provide a relevant example, online meeting services have experienced an immense rise in users ever since the Covid-19 pandemic broke out, as a consequence, many have expressed positive feedback over the convenience as indirect discourse.
However, I believe that the advantages cannot outweigh their own drawbacks. Notably, it can be seen that the commodity of online interaction as well as the decrease in real life contact would result in a loss of incentives to tackle direct communication. Specifically, once individuals have gotten used to social media’s dominance, the prospect of meeting someone else face-to-face seems unappealing. A pertinent example would be a person when given the chance, would prefer to call or text their superiors rather than arranging a direct meeting unless necessary.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are notable upsides as well as consequences to the fall of real life interaction. The prospect of convenient communication is undeniably advantageous, however, it comes with the price of losing human connection. Therefore, I firmly hold the stance that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits.