It is argued that preventing the dissemination of false and harmful content on social media platforms is the top priority for the government. Although there is some compelling reasons for this argument, I personally think that forbidding unusual content is also responsibility for both government and media companies.
On the one hand, There is one major reason that explains why social media has become an integral part of the lives of young people. Adolescents maybe experience intense emotions, both positive and negative so that can make stress in some way. As social media, which can offers an outlet for emotions. Young people may seek comfort, distraction, or support by sharing their feelings online
On the one hand, there is one major reason that explains why the government should solve damaging content. Nowadays, Adolescents maybe experience intense emotions, both positive and negative so that can make stress in some way. As social media, which is a cornerstone of modern communication and can offers an outlet for emotions. Young people may seek comfort, distraction, or support by sharing their feelings online. However, it is also a breeding ground of unverified information by the dissemination of harmful content, which was posted by various users, that can has many potential perils in the future . Meanwhile, government has Immense power to Ensure the veracity of shared content and wield the power to oversee the information on the social media platform. Consequently, the governments has enough power to safeguard the people from harmful information and take responsibility with it.
Admittedly, it is justifiable for some to argue that only the government can solve the harmful content. It is assumed based on the fact that the governments have many power to shape the rule of security in social media, which can minimize the misinformation on the social media platform . However, this line of reasoning is not compelling as it fails to factor in the fact that there is a fine line between content oversight and free expression. In social media, people can share or express their emotions or unique personal identities. The strict cybersecurity laws from the government can infringe on civil liberties when it ignores minority opinions. As the result, the government should collaborate with media companies to cause a social’s equilibrium between regulation and openness.