The proportion that AI could replace teachers or associate professors in educational framework in the foreseeable future is a subject of ongoing debate. I firmly believe that it faces dire ramifications for the society. This essay will delve into the salient drawbacks of this trend, while also touching upon the nectary legislation.
Firstly, the burgeoning integration of disruptive technologies into the educational framework has a devastating effect on the development of the children in toddlerhood, as they causes the addiction. This largely stems from the excessive of AI capabilities. In this case, the students or the pupils lose the concentration during long lectures. It is a pivotal skillset for everyone, because a brain should process information. Otherwise, this triggers degradation of nerve cells in the brain. Of equal importance is the quality of the information. The articulation intelligence is algorithmic-driven and can usually provide the false figures. In stark contrast to AI, teachers use the educational books and are able to educate the topic by virtue of experience.
Secondly, an educator is a human and the pupils are also individuals. Hence, solely the teacher facilitates teamwork and communication. The education has a utility function-nurturing the new generation. A rigorous and comprehensive education needs the socialization, which plays a vital role for communication with other people. Therefore, the mental problems are possible. For instance the share of students with anxiety disorders has markedly increased. In addition, the critical thinking is barely imaginable without teacher.
In conclusion, I reckon that the demerits of AI outweigh the merits, because replacing the teachers result to the degradation of individuals long-term. Moreover, the policy-makers should limit using AI at schools and the universities. Then, the society could raise highly skilled workforce.