The Cambridge IELTS Academic series uses authentic past papers from the official exam creators, making it the most reliable way to practice. Because the material closely matches the real Academic exam in format, logic, and difficulty, it is the best category to start with if you want a true exam experience.
Band 7
In this contemporary era, in many nations, both developed and non-developed, rural people tend more to leave the countryside and move to the cities. As a result, this causes a decline in the demographics of the countryside. From my point of view, this is a positive thing for countries’ development and individuals, which can increase the cities’ productivity and manpower. On the other hand, moving to the urban area can increase the quality of life, which allow people to have comprehensive development.
To begin with, rural people can increase the manpower in urban areas, which can increase the cities’ productivity. This is because cities have more opportunities and work positions to provide to rural people than the countryside, which can attract people to work in the cities and increase the cities’ competitiveness. When the labor population increases, it can bring a considerable revenue to the economy. For instance, the government can receive more tax income, which can be used to build up the infrastructure to help the countries’ development. Moreover, increasing the manpower not only can bring economic income but also boost the countries’ GDP.
While moving to the urban area can improve the quality of life and provide abundant resources such as education and convenience of transportation, it will damage the demographics of the countryside. Consequently, leading to a massive population shortage in the rural districts, which can decrease the manpower and agricultural production. For example, China is a conventional agricultural country, but in recent years it has transferred to a developed country, which causes more of the rural population to move to cities to work. Therefore, causing rural population to have a significant decrease.
In conclusion, the proportion of the rural population change can contribute to the national economy. However, which will damage the demographics of the countryside.
Band 7.0
In many countries, people from rural areas are moving to cities, which leads to a decline in the countryside population. In my opinion, this is mostly a negative development, although it also has some advantages.
On the one hand, moving to cities can bring benefits. Cities usually offer better job opportunities, higher salaries and improved living conditions. For example, people can find work in different industries such as business, technology or services. In addition, cities provide better access to education and healthcare, which can improve people’s quality of life. As a result, many individuals choose to leave rural areas in search of a better future.
However, this trend also creates serious problems. One major issue is the decline of rural areas. When young people leave villages, there are fewer workers to support agriculture and local businesses. This can lead to economic decline and even the disappearance of some communities. Moreover, cities can become overcrowded due to the increasing population. This often results in traffic congestion, pollution and high living costs, which can reduce the quality of life for city residents.
In my view, although urban migration offers some personal benefits, the overall impact is negative. It creates imbalance between rural and urban areas and puts pressure on cities.
In conclusion, the movement of people from the countryside to cities has both advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe it is largely a negative development because of the problems it causes for both rural areas and urban centres.
BAND 7 – 8.5
In modern times, a majority of the population decides to leave rural areas and move into urbanized communities, resulting in a decline in the number of provincial residents. I strongly believe that the rapid mobilization could negatively impact both sides of communities, as overcrowding will be evident in cities, while a smaller population will be left to care for provinces.
Large urban cities are often expected to be the place for better work opportunities and an enhanced quality of life. This is primarily because of modernization, which provides individuals with access to improved resources, thereby creating a bigger space for professional and personal growth. For instance, many families choose to move to cities as higher quality education and a wider range of courses are available for their children.
Consequently, as hundreds of people settle in urban areas nowadays, overcrowding becomes increasingly evident. This could potentially lead to limitations in terms of resources, emphasizing a difficulty in providing residents with their necessities for daily survival. On the other hand, provinces would have fewer occupants, which hinders further development in agriculture, as it is common for farms to be situated in such locations. Without the people to care for these lands, the downsizing of produced crops will be inevitable.
In conclusion, despite the growing number of opportunities that are present in urbanized cities, which significantly influence people’s decision to move, the advantages do not outweigh the drawbacks and could harm not just the environment but the entire population at large. The main issues that may be experienced include overpopulation in cities and a decline in the quality of agricultural harvests due to a reduced count of manpower.
In recent years, the population of rural areas is falling because people in rural areas are moving to urban areas. In my view, this is a negative development because depopulation brings serious problems in both rural and urban societies.
To begin with, when people leave rural areas, schools and medical facilities tend to close as well. This is because essential facilities cannot survive without enough people to use them. For example, in South Korea, many young people move to urban areas to look for better opportunities, while only elderly people remain in rural areas. As a result, there are no longer children in these villages, which means that schools have closed and hospitals have disappeared too.
Furthermore, when too many people move to cities, housing becomes unaffordable for many residents. This is because cities cannot provide enough housing for everyone, causing prices to rise significantly. For example, in Seoul, the city has become so overcrowded that there is little space for new housing, pushing house prices to extremely high levels. As a result, many people struggle to maintain a decent quality of life.
Admittedly, cities have many more convenient facilities than rural areas. However, these benefits do not outweigh the serious problems that this trend creates.
In conclusion, this trend has negative effects on both rural communities, which lose essential services, and cities, which become overcrowded and expensive. Therefore, governments should invest in rural areas to create more jobs and better facilities so that people do not feel the need to leave.
6.5,
Nowadays, in many countries in the world, numerous people from argiculture place are moving to cities, so the population in the village is decreasing slightly.
In my opinion, it is a positive development. This essay will discuss the positive ideas about it.
One of the main benefits to move cities is improving your horizons. Many people who live in the village do not know about life. In their mind, they are just thinking about agriculture, marriage, that is all. It is an influence on their future. For instance, my cousin, who lived in a village, did not know about cities at all. And a little while later, they moved to a city, after that he began to dream of becaming an doctor. It is a reason why people frequently move to the city. The village does not have a high level of education, and it is difficult to study and to start a career.
Purpose to move city is to adapt to a new environment. always remaining in the comfort zone leads to missing the chance to demonstrate your skills, which is a reason why many people stay in the same place, because they are afraid of change.
In conclusion, this is clearly a positive development as it brings numerous benefits to individuals and society as a whole. Moving to another city in order to start a future career can provide more opportunities and personal growth. By contrast, staying in one’s comfort zone may lead to missed chances to realise one’s talents and develop important skills.
In many countries, people are increasingly moving from rural areas to urban centers, leading to declining countryside populations. Although this trend can bring certain economic benefits, I believe it is largely a negative development overall.
On the one hand, migration to cities can creates significant economic advantages. Urban areas typically offer better employment opportunities, higher salaries, and improved public spaces access such as education and healthcare facilities. For example, many young people move to cities after graduating from school in order to find skilled jobs and improve their standards of living. As a result, individuals may achieve greater financial stability and career advancement. From this perspective, urban migration can improve living conditions for those seeking better opportunities.
On the other hand, this movement also creates serious socio-economic problems. Rapid urbanisation often leads to overcrowding, housing shortages, traffic congestion, and increased pressure on public services. At the same time, rural areas suffer from population decline, leaving behind ageing communities, and reducing agricultural productivity. For instance, many rural regions lack high-skilled labor to develop their communities. Consequently, many countryside people struggle with a tedious ambience and limited access to essential services due to underdevelopment. This imbalance weakens national growth and creates inequality between urban and rural regions. In the long-term, such uneven development can cause structural problems that are difficult to reverse. Therefore, many governments around the world attempt to tackle this problems by offering incentives to young people who are willing to return to their rural regions and contribute to local development.
In conclusion, while moving to cities may benefit individuals economically, it generates broader socio-economic challenges. Hence, I believe that rural people moving to city centers and creating declining countryside populations is a negative development overall.
Band 7 TT
As individuals from small towns are moving to modern cities, the number of people in the rural areas is declining. While moving to big cities can help develop educationally and professionally, I can firmly say that this will lead to a concerning development that most of us do not desire.
Many people who want to leave their hometowns do not realize the fact that the cost of living in big cities can go beyond than what they expected. Rents, transportation fees, internet bills and other expenses to live in developed places are usually expensive. The worse part is that people will only get bare minimum products or services with such high prices in these areas. In addition, cities are mostly busy and competitive. That is to say, people who came to look for opportunities are not guaranteed to have a decent paying job, which can lead to stress and depression. For example, Bangkok is a dream place for many workers and students to look for jobs. However, the competition there is quite high, and people usually have to give up and go back to their original destinations.
What is more, some professionals, such as doctors, and lecturers, are disappearing in remote areas as they do not wish to work in these locations. As a consequence, this leads to a daunting effect on the overall health care system and other developments. For instances, children from rural areas are underserved in all aspects of their development, especially education, resulting in the degradation of everything in the countryside when quality education is not available.
To sum up, for the above reasons, I believe that people trying to live and work in developed parts of the country will only cause negative improvement in the country.
Nowadays, people argue about whether moving from rural areas to city centers is a positive progression in one’s life, while others disagree. I absolutely believe that this migration is a negative development. In this essay, I will explain my opinion with examples.
The main reason that moving to city centers from the countryside can affect agricultural activities is that agricultural product prices are highly affected by this movement. As a result, consumers see high prices on market shelves. Furthermore, moving from the countryside leads to unemployment among farmers. Especially these days, people cannot consume meat-related products due to agricultural employee shortages. In addition, even if farmers give high salaries to employees, they move to cities because urban planning and job opportunities are really appealing for individuals who have been living in the countryside for many years.
The second reason is that moving from rural areas can lead to negative consequences in one’s life. For example, house prices, traffic congestion, and the population using public facilities increase significantly. Take Italy as an example; due to immigration from rural areas, people cannot find appointments for health services. In addition, commuting time increases significantly due to the increasing population. Owing to the rapid pace of immigration, the Italian government started to introduce new incentives to encourage reverse migration.
On the other hand, some people believe that moving to the city center is a positive development. Accessing the city center was really hard for individuals in the past. As a result, people had to take a bus or persuade their neighbors to access cities. However, people can access basic amenities in their neighborhoods nowadays. Thanks to diverse facilities for individuals, such as hospitals, shopping centers, swimming pools, and gym centers, people regret remigrating and continue to live in cities.
Although there is some confusion about whether remigration is a positive development, I believe that people, particularly farmers, should stay in rural areas. Without residents in villages and rural areas, higher prices will be waiting for us. Personally, I think the government should promote living in the countryside through incentives and provide productive land for farmers, rather than building more buildings and facilities in the city center.
People living in rural areas are opting to move to cities, leading to a downward trend in the population from the countryside. This demographic shift brings not only advantages but also disadvantages. In this essay, both views will be discussed, and I will explain why I strongly believe that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, moving to cities makes people accessible to greater job opportunities and employment, enhancing their monthly earnings. This trend allows employees to improve their living standards and social status. Moreover, it provides advanced techniques and equipment for healthcare, improving the quality of life for the ageing population. From the educational perspective, students tend to explore accomplished methods of learning, assisting in their academic performance. For instance, a learner living in a capital city is more likely to have better chances to purchase quick-tips notes and approach their full potential for educational achievements, as compared to a student in the countryside. The proponents of this view contend that shifting to developed places benefits people of all ages from their respective aspects.
On the other hand, the critics seem to believe its negative impacts outweigh its advantages. Abandoning rural areas creates inconvenience for agricultural production. To be clear, as farmers and workers tend to reside in cities, this results in a decreasing number of people to cultivate rice plants, a main source of food in Asian countries. In contrast, the crowded population downtown means a lack of sufficient accommodation and damage to drainage systems. Consequently, an absence of sanitation brings infectious diseases such as diarrhea and Hepatitis B.
In my opinion, although inhabiting an urban area after moving from a rural setting offers positive effects, its negative impacts are more likely to be considered. A balanced approach, where the government guarantees the improvement of the countryside, with enough people to fill agricultural jobs, should be placed as the first priority.
In conclusion, shifting to advanced places offers people more opportunities and a broader range of safety, whereas it encourages diseases aligned with a lack of clean facilities because of the crowded population and a shrinking workforce for the cultivation of plants in the countryside. Thus, I advocate that the drawbacks of accumulating in urban regions prevail over its benefits.
Nowadays, numerous people are choosing to reside in cities instead of the countryside due to various factors; as a result, the number of individuals in rural areas is decreasing. I firmly believe that this leads to positive development because it creates various avenues for people.
One of the significant factors for people leaving is that they find a lot of benefits in town. First of all, they can pursue any kind of occupation according to their skills and can live a healthier life as compared to a village. Moreover, it creates job opportunities for people who aim to live a luxurious life, which is not possible in a rural area. For instance, people can earn a lot of currency and establish their own business, which enhances their stability. Due to the huge number of people in a conurbation, it is easier for company managers to advertise their products to a significant number.
However, instead of some benefits, there are also some drawbacks which citizens need to understand. People often find difficulties in terms of shelter; it’s challenging for those people who don’t have proper knowledge about specific areas and the environment. Another con is that there will be fewer people in the countryside, which often leads to a lack of farming. To illustrate, most of the vegetables are grown inside the countryside, and therefore people who live in cities can’t get regular species. Consequently, in spite of some benefits, it is needed to have some people stay in rural areas.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks, I consider that there are various positive developments while residing in cities where people can pursue their life in a better way. However, it is indispensable to keep their side effects in check in an effective way. 8
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.
Plans & Pricing
Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone. However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support! By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.
For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less
What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:
Chọn gói:
419,000₫277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng(chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng(chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng(chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng(chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)
Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Band 7
In this contemporary era, in many nations, both developed and non-developed, rural people tend more to leave the countryside and move to the cities. As a result, this causes a decline in the demographics of the countryside. From my point of view, this is a positive thing for countries’ development and individuals, which can increase the cities’ productivity and manpower. On the other hand, moving to the urban area can increase the quality of life, which allow people to have comprehensive development.
To begin with, rural people can increase the manpower in urban areas, which can increase the cities’ productivity. This is because cities have more opportunities and work positions to provide to rural people than the countryside, which can attract people to work in the cities and increase the cities’ competitiveness. When the labor population increases, it can bring a considerable revenue to the economy. For instance, the government can receive more tax income, which can be used to build up the infrastructure to help the countries’ development. Moreover, increasing the manpower not only can bring economic income but also boost the countries’ GDP.
While moving to the urban area can improve the quality of life and provide abundant resources such as education and convenience of transportation, it will damage the demographics of the countryside. Consequently, leading to a massive population shortage in the rural districts, which can decrease the manpower and agricultural production. For example, China is a conventional agricultural country, but in recent years it has transferred to a developed country, which causes more of the rural population to move to cities to work. Therefore, causing rural population to have a significant decrease.
In conclusion, the proportion of the rural population change can contribute to the national economy. However, which will damage the demographics of the countryside.
Band 7.0
In many countries, people from rural areas are moving to cities, which leads to a decline in the countryside population. In my opinion, this is mostly a negative development, although it also has some advantages.
On the one hand, moving to cities can bring benefits. Cities usually offer better job opportunities, higher salaries and improved living conditions. For example, people can find work in different industries such as business, technology or services. In addition, cities provide better access to education and healthcare, which can improve people’s quality of life. As a result, many individuals choose to leave rural areas in search of a better future.
However, this trend also creates serious problems. One major issue is the decline of rural areas. When young people leave villages, there are fewer workers to support agriculture and local businesses. This can lead to economic decline and even the disappearance of some communities. Moreover, cities can become overcrowded due to the increasing population. This often results in traffic congestion, pollution and high living costs, which can reduce the quality of life for city residents.
In my view, although urban migration offers some personal benefits, the overall impact is negative. It creates imbalance between rural and urban areas and puts pressure on cities.
In conclusion, the movement of people from the countryside to cities has both advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe it is largely a negative development because of the problems it causes for both rural areas and urban centres.
BAND 7 – 8.5
In modern times, a majority of the population decides to leave rural areas and move into urbanized communities, resulting in a decline in the number of provincial residents. I strongly believe that the rapid mobilization could negatively impact both sides of communities, as overcrowding will be evident in cities, while a smaller population will be left to care for provinces.
Large urban cities are often expected to be the place for better work opportunities and an enhanced quality of life. This is primarily because of modernization, which provides individuals with access to improved resources, thereby creating a bigger space for professional and personal growth. For instance, many families choose to move to cities as higher quality education and a wider range of courses are available for their children.
Consequently, as hundreds of people settle in urban areas nowadays, overcrowding becomes increasingly evident. This could potentially lead to limitations in terms of resources, emphasizing a difficulty in providing residents with their necessities for daily survival. On the other hand, provinces would have fewer occupants, which hinders further development in agriculture, as it is common for farms to be situated in such locations. Without the people to care for these lands, the downsizing of produced crops will be inevitable.
In conclusion, despite the growing number of opportunities that are present in urbanized cities, which significantly influence people’s decision to move, the advantages do not outweigh the drawbacks and could harm not just the environment but the entire population at large. The main issues that may be experienced include overpopulation in cities and a decline in the quality of agricultural harvests due to a reduced count of manpower.
can you tell me how I could broaden my vocabulary, I noticed that I only use simple words instead of complicated ones
In recent years, the population of rural areas is falling because people in rural areas are moving to urban areas. In my view, this is a negative development because depopulation brings serious problems in both rural and urban societies.
To begin with, when people leave rural areas, schools and medical facilities tend to close as well. This is because essential facilities cannot survive without enough people to use them. For example, in South Korea, many young people move to urban areas to look for better opportunities, while only elderly people remain in rural areas. As a result, there are no longer children in these villages, which means that schools have closed and hospitals have disappeared too.
Furthermore, when too many people move to cities, housing becomes unaffordable for many residents. This is because cities cannot provide enough housing for everyone, causing prices to rise significantly. For example, in Seoul, the city has become so overcrowded that there is little space for new housing, pushing house prices to extremely high levels. As a result, many people struggle to maintain a decent quality of life.
Admittedly, cities have many more convenient facilities than rural areas. However, these benefits do not outweigh the serious problems that this trend creates.
In conclusion, this trend has negative effects on both rural communities, which lose essential services, and cities, which become overcrowded and expensive. Therefore, governments should invest in rural areas to create more jobs and better facilities so that people do not feel the need to leave.
6.5,
Nowadays, in many countries in the world, numerous people from argiculture place are moving to cities, so the population in the village is decreasing slightly.
In my opinion, it is a positive development. This essay will discuss the positive ideas about it.
One of the main benefits to move cities is improving your horizons. Many people who live in the village do not know about life. In their mind, they are just thinking about agriculture, marriage, that is all. It is an influence on their future. For instance, my cousin, who lived in a village, did not know about cities at all. And a little while later, they moved to a city, after that he began to dream of becaming an doctor. It is a reason why people frequently move to the city. The village does not have a high level of education, and it is difficult to study and to start a career.
Purpose to move city is to adapt to a new environment. always remaining in the comfort zone leads to missing the chance to demonstrate your skills, which is a reason why many people stay in the same place, because they are afraid of change.
In conclusion, this is clearly a positive development as it brings numerous benefits to individuals and society as a whole. Moving to another city in order to start a future career can provide more opportunities and personal growth. By contrast, staying in one’s comfort zone may lead to missed chances to realise one’s talents and develop important skills.
Band 8
In many countries, people are increasingly moving from rural areas to urban centers, leading to declining countryside populations. Although this trend can bring certain economic benefits, I believe it is largely a negative development overall.
On the one hand, migration to cities can creates significant economic advantages. Urban areas typically offer better employment opportunities, higher salaries, and improved public spaces access such as education and healthcare facilities. For example, many young people move to cities after graduating from school in order to find skilled jobs and improve their standards of living. As a result, individuals may achieve greater financial stability and career advancement. From this perspective, urban migration can improve living conditions for those seeking better opportunities.
On the other hand, this movement also creates serious socio-economic problems. Rapid urbanisation often leads to overcrowding, housing shortages, traffic congestion, and increased pressure on public services. At the same time, rural areas suffer from population decline, leaving behind ageing communities, and reducing agricultural productivity. For instance, many rural regions lack high-skilled labor to develop their communities. Consequently, many countryside people struggle with a tedious ambience and limited access to essential services due to underdevelopment. This imbalance weakens national growth and creates inequality between urban and rural regions. In the long-term, such uneven development can cause structural problems that are difficult to reverse. Therefore, many governments around the world attempt to tackle this problems by offering incentives to young people who are willing to return to their rural regions and contribute to local development.
In conclusion, while moving to cities may benefit individuals economically, it generates broader socio-economic challenges. Hence, I believe that rural people moving to city centers and creating declining countryside populations is a negative development overall.
Band 7 TT
As individuals from small towns are moving to modern cities, the number of people in the rural areas is declining. While moving to big cities can help develop educationally and professionally, I can firmly say that this will lead to a concerning development that most of us do not desire.
Many people who want to leave their hometowns do not realize the fact that the cost of living in big cities can go beyond than what they expected. Rents, transportation fees, internet bills and other expenses to live in developed places are usually expensive. The worse part is that people will only get bare minimum products or services with such high prices in these areas. In addition, cities are mostly busy and competitive. That is to say, people who came to look for opportunities are not guaranteed to have a decent paying job, which can lead to stress and depression. For example, Bangkok is a dream place for many workers and students to look for jobs. However, the competition there is quite high, and people usually have to give up and go back to their original destinations.
What is more, some professionals, such as doctors, and lecturers, are disappearing in remote areas as they do not wish to work in these locations. As a consequence, this leads to a daunting effect on the overall health care system and other developments. For instances, children from rural areas are underserved in all aspects of their development, especially education, resulting in the degradation of everything in the countryside when quality education is not available.
To sum up, for the above reasons, I believe that people trying to live and work in developed parts of the country will only cause negative improvement in the country.
Nowadays, people argue about whether moving from rural areas to city centers is a positive progression in one’s life, while others disagree. I absolutely believe that this migration is a negative development. In this essay, I will explain my opinion with examples.
The main reason that moving to city centers from the countryside can affect agricultural activities is that agricultural product prices are highly affected by this movement. As a result, consumers see high prices on market shelves. Furthermore, moving from the countryside leads to unemployment among farmers. Especially these days, people cannot consume meat-related products due to agricultural employee shortages. In addition, even if farmers give high salaries to employees, they move to cities because urban planning and job opportunities are really appealing for individuals who have been living in the countryside for many years.
The second reason is that moving from rural areas can lead to negative consequences in one’s life. For example, house prices, traffic congestion, and the population using public facilities increase significantly. Take Italy as an example; due to immigration from rural areas, people cannot find appointments for health services. In addition, commuting time increases significantly due to the increasing population. Owing to the rapid pace of immigration, the Italian government started to introduce new incentives to encourage reverse migration.
On the other hand, some people believe that moving to the city center is a positive development. Accessing the city center was really hard for individuals in the past. As a result, people had to take a bus or persuade their neighbors to access cities. However, people can access basic amenities in their neighborhoods nowadays. Thanks to diverse facilities for individuals, such as hospitals, shopping centers, swimming pools, and gym centers, people regret remigrating and continue to live in cities.
Although there is some confusion about whether remigration is a positive development, I believe that people, particularly farmers, should stay in rural areas. Without residents in villages and rural areas, higher prices will be waiting for us. Personally, I think the government should promote living in the countryside through incentives and provide productive land for farmers, rather than building more buildings and facilities in the city center.
band 8.5
People living in rural areas are opting to move to cities, leading to a downward trend in the population from the countryside. This demographic shift brings not only advantages but also disadvantages. In this essay, both views will be discussed, and I will explain why I strongly believe that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, moving to cities makes people accessible to greater job opportunities and employment, enhancing their monthly earnings. This trend allows employees to improve their living standards and social status. Moreover, it provides advanced techniques and equipment for healthcare, improving the quality of life for the ageing population. From the educational perspective, students tend to explore accomplished methods of learning, assisting in their academic performance. For instance, a learner living in a capital city is more likely to have better chances to purchase quick-tips notes and approach their full potential for educational achievements, as compared to a student in the countryside. The proponents of this view contend that shifting to developed places benefits people of all ages from their respective aspects.
On the other hand, the critics seem to believe its negative impacts outweigh its advantages. Abandoning rural areas creates inconvenience for agricultural production. To be clear, as farmers and workers tend to reside in cities, this results in a decreasing number of people to cultivate rice plants, a main source of food in Asian countries. In contrast, the crowded population downtown means a lack of sufficient accommodation and damage to drainage systems. Consequently, an absence of sanitation brings infectious diseases such as diarrhea and Hepatitis B.
In my opinion, although inhabiting an urban area after moving from a rural setting offers positive effects, its negative impacts are more likely to be considered. A balanced approach, where the government guarantees the improvement of the countryside, with enough people to fill agricultural jobs, should be placed as the first priority.
In conclusion, shifting to advanced places offers people more opportunities and a broader range of safety, whereas it encourages diseases aligned with a lack of clean facilities because of the crowded population and a shrinking workforce for the cultivation of plants in the countryside. Thus, I advocate that the drawbacks of accumulating in urban regions prevail over its benefits.
Nowadays, numerous people are choosing to reside in cities instead of the countryside due to various factors; as a result, the number of individuals in rural areas is decreasing. I firmly believe that this leads to positive development because it creates various avenues for people.
One of the significant factors for people leaving is that they find a lot of benefits in town. First of all, they can pursue any kind of occupation according to their skills and can live a healthier life as compared to a village. Moreover, it creates job opportunities for people who aim to live a luxurious life, which is not possible in a rural area. For instance, people can earn a lot of currency and establish their own business, which enhances their stability. Due to the huge number of people in a conurbation, it is easier for company managers to advertise their products to a significant number.
However, instead of some benefits, there are also some drawbacks which citizens need to understand. People often find difficulties in terms of shelter; it’s challenging for those people who don’t have proper knowledge about specific areas and the environment. Another con is that there will be fewer people in the countryside, which often leads to a lack of farming. To illustrate, most of the vegetables are grown inside the countryside, and therefore people who live in cities can’t get regular species. Consequently, in spite of some benefits, it is needed to have some people stay in rural areas.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks, I consider that there are various positive developments while residing in cities where people can pursue their life in a better way. However, it is indispensable to keep their side effects in check in an effective way. 8