Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image contains two graphs, one labeled as "Rural Share of Poverty, 1993 and 2002" and the other as "Rural vs. Urban Poverty 2002". The bar chart shows percentages for rural poverty share in 1993 and 2002 for seven regions: East Asia & Pacific, Middle East & North Africa, South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia, Europe & Central Asia, and Latin America & the Caribbean. In 1993, percentages range from around 35% to 100%, with Sub-Saharan Africa having the highest and Europe & Central Asia the lowest. In 2002, percentages range from around 20% to 90%, with Sub-Saharan Africa still highest and Europe & Central Asia lowest. The pie chart indicates that in 2002, 76% of poverty was rural and 24% urban.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of poverty in six different rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart depicts the fraction of poverty in rural and urban areas in 2002. Units are measured in percentage.

Overall, In 1993 majority of the rural areas had higher percentage of poverty when compared to 2002 except Europe and Central Asia where they had higher percentage of poverty in 2002. With a greater majority rural area had maximum poverty fraction when compared to urban area in 2002.

East Asia and Pacific had the maximum poverty percentage in both years (about 100%) when compared to rest of the rural areas. In other rural areas, 1993 had slight greater fraction of poverty than 2002 (Middle East & North America, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa had difference under 5%) excluding Europe and Central Asia whose 2002 poverty fraction (about 70%) was significantly greater than 1993 (above 50%).

Latin America and Caribbean had the least poverty fraction in the years 1993(about 50%) and 2002(40%). In 2002, poverty percentage of rural areas had predominant majority of 76% over urban areas (24%).

Word Count: 186

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

poverty: 10

rural: 7

areas: 7

fraction: 5

percentage: 4

years: 3

urban: 3

majority: 3

compared: 3

greater: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by summarizing the main features of both charts and making relevant comparisons. The overall structure is clear, with an introduction, an overview, and detailed paragraphs. However, there are some inaccuracies in data interpretation (e.g., East Asia & Pacific is described as having the maximum poverty percentage, while the visual description indicates Sub-Saharan Africa was highest). Additionally, the report mentions six rural areas instead of seven, and the comparison for Europe & Central Asia could be more precise. To improve, ensure data accuracy and avoid minor omissions. The overview could be more concise and better highlight key trends.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a logical structure, but the flow is sometimes disrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear connections between ideas. The first paragraph introduces the charts well, but the second paragraph's overall statement is confusing due to phrasing like 'With a greater majority rural area had maximum poverty fraction'. The use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes inaccurate. Consider using clearer linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear central idea. The report would benefit from more effective paragraphing and smoother transitions between sentences.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some good attempts at paraphrasing (e.g., 'proportion of poverty', 'fraction of poverty'). However, there are several inaccuracies and awkward choices, such as 'majority of the rural areas', 'maximum poverty fraction', and 'slight greater fraction'. The range of vocabulary is limited, and some terms are repeated. To improve, use more precise and varied vocabulary (e.g., 'proportion', 'percentage', 'share', 'rate') and ensure collocations are natural (e.g., 'a higher percentage', 'a significant difference'). Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors and awkward structures that affect clarity. Examples include 'In 1993 majority of the rural areas had higher percentage of poverty when compared to 2002 except Europe and Central Asia where they had higher percentage of poverty in 2002' (run-on sentence, missing articles) and '1993 had slight greater fraction of poverty than 2002' (incorrect comparative form). Punctuation is inconsistent, and sentence structures are often repetitive. To improve, focus on using a wider range of sentence structures, ensuring subject-verb agreement, and using articles correctly. Proofreading for basic errors would also help.

Answers On The Same Topic:

See All

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The pie chart show proportions of people in three countries who learned English through evening classes, online courses and studying abroad in 2010 and 2015. Overall, it is clear that while the figures for online learning witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for evening classes, leading to a significant narrowing of the gap […]

Band 7+

See All

Band 6+: The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The graph below shows unemployment levels in Ireland and the number of people leaving the country between 1988 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The line graph and table below give information about tourism growth and the number of ride-hailing users in four Vietnamese cities between 2015 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph and table below give information about tourism growth and the number of ride-hailing users in four Vietnamese cities between 2015 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph and table below give information about tourism growth and the number of ride-hailing users in four Vietnamese cities between 2015 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium