🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 8+: The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows a line graph titled "Recycling Rate for Selected Materials: 1982-2010," comparing the recycling percentage of four materials over time, with Paper & cardboard starting at 70%, peaking at 80% in 1994 and remaining stable, Glass containers starting at 50%, gradually increasing to 70% by 2010, Aluminium cans starting at 20%, showing a sharp rise to 70% by 1990 and maintaining that level, and Plastics starting at 10%, with a steady increase to 40% by 2010.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph illustrates the percentages of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics that were recycled in a specific country between 1982 and 2010.

Overall, paper and cardboard observed the highest recycling rates throughout the timeline, while plastics showed the lowest figures. Notably, aluminum cans demonstrated significant growth over the 28 years.

In 1982, about 65% of paper and cardboard was recycled. This figure fluctuated before climbing steeply to peak at 80% in 1994. However, from then on, it dropped steadily to 70% in 2010. In 1982, half of all glass containers were recycled; after falling below 40% in 1990, the glass recycling rate gradually increased to 60% by 2010.

Aluminum cans were first recycled in 1986, starting at about 5%, but this figure increased rapidly over 25 years, and by 2010, it had reached 45%. In contrast, plastic recycling was not introduced until 1990, and although the growth in this category was also steady, it was very slow, rising from about 2% to around 8% over the period.

Word Count: 172

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

materials (paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics) in the US from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard remained the most recycled material, while plastic had the lowest recycling figures throughout the period. Aluminium and glass both showed gradual increases. At the beginning, paper and cardboard had a high recycling rate of […]

The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

he line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four distinct materials—Paper & Cardboard, Glass Containers, Aluminium Cans, and Plastics—from 1982 to 2010 within a specific country. Overall, Paper & Cardboard maintained the highest recycling rates throughout the period, while Plastics exhibited the lowest rates. Notably, Aluminium Cans showed a significant increase in recycling efficiency. In […]

The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph describe Nepal’s recycling rate for different materials over a period of 28 years from 1982 Overall, paper and cardboard, and glass containers were the highest percentage from the beginning of the period until the end of the year. In contract, Aluminum cans and plastics were the lowest rate of four selected materials […]

The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The provided line graph delineates the recycling rates of four distinct materials—paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics—within a specific country from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard observed the highest recycling rates throughout the timeline, while plastics exhibited the lowest figures. Notably, aluminum cans demonstrated significant growth during the observed period. […]

See All

Other Topics:

The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the United Kingdom by four different types of transport between 1980 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons

The line graph illustrates the number of goods delivered by various kinds of transport in the UK from 1980 to 2008. Overall, the road was the primary method of transport throughout the timeframe. In addition, moved by water and pipeline were also displayed nearly the same trend, rail experienced fluctuation. To begin with, trasnported by […]

The graph below shows the daily consumption of three spreads per person from 1981 to 2007 in a country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates the amount of three types of spreads (margarine, low fat & reduced spreads, and butter) consumed from 1981 to 2007. Overall, the consumption of margarine and butter decreased over the years, whereas low fat & reduced spreads increased. At the start of the period, butter was the most popular spread. Margarine […]

The graph below shows the number of international tourists visiting three different countries between 2000 and 2010.

The line graph illustrates the number of international tourists visiting three different countries from 2000 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that France had the highest figure, while Japan had the smallest figure of international tourists visiting among the three countries. Additionally, all three countries showed dramatic changes during the period. In 2000, the USA […]

the graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario in 2001 and 2007

Given is a line graph illustrating the data about the hiring teachers who learn English and French languages in Ontario between 2001 and 2007. Overall,it is clear that French-language teachers’ percentage were higher, whereas English-language teachers’ percenatge were lower. In 2001, the propotion of French-language teachers was approximately 70%. Within a year, the figure sa […]

The line graph shows the number of smartphone users in the UK, the USA and Canada from 2000 to 2020.

The given line graph illustrates the usage of mobile phones in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Canada in millions from the year 2000 to 2020. Overall, the usage of cell phones in the USA measured the highest numbers until 2015, then shows a slight decline in the following years. Meanwhile, the […]

The line graph shows the number of smartphone users in the UK, the USA and Canada from 2000 to 2020.

THE GIVEN LINE GRAPH ILLUSTRATES THE USAGE OF MOBILE PHONES IN THE UNITED KINGDON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IN THE CANADA IN MILLIONS FROM THE YEAR 2000 TO 2020. OVERALL, THE USAGE OF CELL PHONES IN THE USA MEASURED HIGHEST NUMBERS TILL 2015 THEN SHOWS A SLIGHT DECLINE IN THE NEXT YEARS. WHILE UK […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.