Table

Band 5+: The tables below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people (club members and the general public) who showed their opinions about a new theatre. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The tables below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people (club members and the general public) who showed their opinions about a new theatre. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays three tables with ratings from 'Club members' and 'General public' across three categories. For 'Production Quality', ratings from Club members were 70% Excellent, 17% Satisfactory, and 13% Poor, while ratings from the General public were 67% Excellent, 18% Satisfactory, and 15% Poor. For 'Information about the plays/performances to the public', ratings from Club members were 72% Excellent, 23% Satisfactory, and 5% Poor, while ratings from the General public were 88% Excellent, 10% Satisfactory, and 2% Poor. For 'Facilities in the theatre', ratings from Club members were 75% Excellent, 23% Satisfactory, and 2% Poor, while ratings from the General public were 55% Excellent, 19% Satisfactory, and 26% Poor.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given table illustrates the percentage of respondents, including club members and the general population, showing their perspectives about three different categories of a new theatre.

Overall, both groups showed their positive views of the theatre, with “excellent” the most common rating in every category. Club member were most positive with Quality, while public population gave the highest ratings to Information.

Looking first at the Quality with the highest positive ratings, 88% of club members gave an excellent rating, while only more than a half of general public rated it as excellent. The satisfied ratings accounted for 10% of club members, which was one-fourth of general population. Only 2% and 7% of club members and general public voted quality as poor respectively. The relatively similar result was recorded in the figure for Facilities, with 2% and 8% of club members and general public giving poor ratings. The percentages of respondents voting Facilities as satisfied took up a quarter of the overall, with 26% of club members and 24% of general public respectively. There was 72% of club members voting Facilities as excellent compared to 64% of general public.

Turning to the remaining category, Information received less negative opinions from general public compared to that from club members, with 66% and 54% of excellent ratings respectively. While 20% and 14% public respondents voted Information as satisfied and poor respectively, the proportion of club members (30%) giving satisfied ratings doubled the figure for poor ratings (16%), making it the highest negative rating receiver.

Word Count: 251

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

5.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C2 - Complex
Continue to challenge and refine your language choices.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

members: 9

general: 8

public: 7

ratings: 7

excellent: 4

satisfied: 4

respectively: 4

respondents: 3

population: 3

positive: 3

rating: 3

quality: 3

while: 3

highest: 3

facilities: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report addresses the task and provides an overview, but there are several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the data presented. For example, the figures for 'Production Quality' are misreported (e.g., 88% for club members instead of 70%, and the general public's 'excellent' rating is incorrectly stated as 'more than a half' when it is 67%). Additionally, the data for 'Facilities' and 'Information' are not accurately reflected (e.g., club members' 'excellent' for Facilities is given as 72% instead of 75%, and the general public's 'excellent' for Information is 66% instead of 88%). The report also omits some key comparisons and includes some irrelevant or unclear phrasing. To improve, ensure that all figures are accurately transcribed from the visual, and focus on clearly summarizing the main trends and making precise comparisons between the two groups across all categories.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a logical structure with an introduction, an overview, and detailed paragraphs. However, the flow is sometimes disrupted by unclear references and awkward phrasing, such as 'Looking first at the Quality with the highest positive ratings' and 'The relatively similar result was recorded in the figure for Facilities'. The use of cohesive devices is adequate but could be more natural to improve readability. Consider using clearer topic sentences and smoother transitions between ideas to enhance coherence.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary is generally appropriate for the task, with some good attempts at paraphrasing (e.g., 'perspectives', 'positive views'). However, there are instances of imprecise word choices and repetition, such as 'public population' and 'voted quality as poor'. The range of vocabulary is limited in places, and some phrases are not idiomatic (e.g., 'took up a quarter of the overall'). To improve, aim for more varied and natural lexical items, and ensure that terms like 'respondents' and 'ratings' are used consistently and accurately. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors and awkward structures that affect clarity. For example, 'Club member were most positive' (subject-verb agreement), 'while only more than a half of general public rated it as excellent' (incomplete comparison), and 'the proportion of club members (30%) giving satisfied ratings doubled the figure for poor ratings (16%)' (unclear phrasing). Punctuation is mostly correct, but sentence structures are often repetitive or convoluted. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement, use a wider range of sentence structures, and ensure that comparisons are clearly and accurately expressed.

Answers On The Same Topic:

See All

The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The production of milk annually in four nations in the three years 1990, 2000 and 2010 was displayed in the table below. Overall, as can be seen from the table, there was an upward trend for all countries, except for the amount of milk in Australia, where a decrease was witnessed. While the Netherlands consistently […]

Band 6+

the table below shows the result of survey in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university

The table displays the proportion of students who gave positive ratings to five different aspects of a university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Overall, such aspects as teaching quality and electronic resources tended to increase in terms of percentage of students giving good ratings; print resources remained relatively high throughout the period, fluctuating slightly, while […]

Band 8+

The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Band 7+

The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods (wheat, maize, rice) by people in four different countries.

The table illustrates the daily consumption of three staple foods (wheat, maize, and rice) in four different countries, measured in calories per person. “Overall, it can be seen that each country demonstrates a dominant preference for a specific staple food. Rice is by far the most consumed food in Cambodia, whereas wheat leads in Egypt […]

Band 9

The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words.

The given table provides information about five main types of fast food consumed in Melbourne including predictions to 2025. Overall, it is readily apparent from table that hamburger was most preferable choice and it maintains its dominance now, whereas units of noodles consumed by people stayed their lowest position from past to now. In fact, […]

Band 6+

The table shows the two age groups participating in the marathon from 2008 to 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table demonstrates that the two different age groups participating in the marathon from 2008 to 2012. This table indicates not only age groups, but also total participants over years. Overall, the tendency of participating a marathon was increased regulary. Therefore, the number of age group of 18-39 was always higher than age group […]

Band 6+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium