Over the last few decades the debates about how teenagers should spend their time has become increasingly relevant. Some people argue that students should have a part-time job, while others believe that woking can negatively affect their education. This essay will examine both views before arriving to a reasonable conclusion.
Supporters of the former view suppose that combining to parts of life provides students with essential knowledge and skills. Moreover, it can teach teenagers to separate their time. For instance, having both school and work as a priority helps student to manage time and to develop skills of working in the future. Although, youngsters can practice their skills exactly at the work, so they can become amazing employers in the future.
Advocates of the letter opinion believe that it is impossible to do both things and to have it on a good enough level. In their opinion, work is affects a lot studies of teenagers because they pay to much attention to it instead of learning at school. Youngsters try to earn money so they may feel mature and independent but they forget about the most important, to educate.
Taking both sides into consideration, I believe that each view has its merits. Being mature enough to combine both skills is an amazing feature, but most of students can not keep it on equivalent level. That is why I personally lean towards to support the letter view.