There is a debate over whether schools should make pupils who do not have a predisposition to learning languages study them. Nowadays, living in a globalized world, children should acquire a set of hard and soft skills to succeed in the future. Thus, I totally support the idea of schools forcing students to learn a second language for two reasons.
First of all, languages are an inherent part of the curriculum for a reason. Along with other school subjects, they develop different abilities that can make children competitive in their future career. However, no one is doubtful about the benefit of, for example, Maths, Physics or Biology despite the difficulties pupils encounter while studying them. In contrast to the exact sciences, languages contribute to the development of cognitive skills such as memory, concentration, thinking, and verbal abilities. These skills can also transfer to other academic subjects, helping to improve an overall performance and intellectual capabilities.
Secondly, schools should oblige their students to learn languages, instilling that this will stand them in good stead in several years. Early language education gives children a chance to improve their career prospects. The younger the person is, the quicker and easier they master a new language. In the modern world, many companies require candidates to be bilingual or even multilingual in order to occupy high-paying positions. So, it is better to overcome difficulty at an early age rather than arrive at the realization of the importance of knowing several languages too late.
To summarize, I personally think that making language classes compulsory has undeniable benefits. Although many pupils may struggle with studying a second language, overcoming this difficulty will assist them in the development of their cognitive skills and contribute to career advancement in the future.