It is often argued that children who are brought up in families with low fund sources are better equipped for adult life than adolescents from a rich family. The essay disagrees with the given statement, because parent’s upbringing plays a bigger role in offspring’s decision-making skill than their wealth.
It is not a secret that a child of a poor family faces a number of limits and problems from a young age. However, it is stereotypical to think that offspring of a low-income family will be more responsible with their own funds in future than a child from a wealthy household. Due to facing a lot of financial challenges and having the limitations for different abilities may affect adulthood. To fulfill their childhood need they may spend a quite big amount of funds on different facilities, and become irresponsible in adulthood. For instance, scientist presented a chance to buy anything in the store for two children from different families. The experiment found out that a child who was brought up in poverty spent bigger amount of money than the second child.
On the other hand, life experience also plays an essential role for person’s future. That is to say that some people will understand the value of money when they face with financial problems. However, children from wealthy households have the access to high quality education, where they will develop knowledge about how to manage funds better. Furthermore, if individuals get a good upbringing from their parents, it will outweigh any wealth.
In conclusion, the essay disagrees that the families economic state will affect child’s individual. Despite their parents finance all type of children have equal chance to manage the problems in future.