Comprehensive English programs are provided by both Traditional and International Universities. However, there are sharp distinctions in the way they are delivered as well as the available resources and diversity of students which believed to have impact on the learning experience.
Education in Vietnam has historically been characterized by a focus on theory, particularly in the context of English language acquisition. Grammatical and sentence structure instruction is prioritized in educational courses from primary to high school. In that general situation, certain old or minor universities will continue to concentrate on the development and teaching of static literature and the development of exam-oriented courses. At Indiana University, the majority of the time will be dedicated to the development and practice of speaking and listening abilities in English. This is an educational method that is conducive to the natural unfolding of language acquisition. The English teaching method at IU does not contain individuals who assist students in enhancing their communication skills and reading comprehension; rather, it establishes a strong foundation for future advancement in the study of English and other languages.
On the other hand, a primary reason between the two english teaching methods relates to the prioritizing and focus on variety of English aspects. Traditional education highly approaches English with a profound academic lens, whereas English education at IU readily assist leaners to equip vital real-world knowledge aiming for orientating students to a successful person as a global citizen. Furthermore, a significant target of IU is not only overall enhancing the wide range of skills, but also consistently nourishing the moral of each student. Consequently, English teaching programs always pay attention to create a collaboration environment such as the lectures about teamwork aspiration, partners’ resonance, and presentation for the purpose of evolution a comprehensive soft skill.
The availability of resources is yet another important aspect that distinguishes between traditional universities and international ones. In most cases, traditional institutions have quite a variety of libraries and definite number of language laboratories. However, they tend to be lacking when it comes to modern pedagogical methods and equipment. Most of the time, on the contrary, universities which are international, have adopted the most modern educational technologies, including but not limited to: interactive whiteboards, online platforms or technologies as well as platforms for virtual reality educational exercises. These institutions also have facilities such as online databases and other institutions that provide independent learning tools for the students.
In conclusion, the comparative analysis of English teaching and learning at universities shows their effective interaction. In addition, the teaching and learning method in an all-English environment at IU helps to increase communication skills as well as to acquire broader knowledge in the world. IU and English-speaking universities have created favorable conditions for students to have access to deeper knowledge in English instead of having to translate into their mother tongue.