Every day dozens of vehicles transport farm goods from rural areas and villages to different places. Basically, food industries rely on these transportations to produce people’s alimentary needs. However, there is notion among people that if we only consumed local manufactured foods, it would bring severe economic and environmental benefits. In this essay, I’m inclined to elaborate on the merits and drawbacks of this statement and why I believe that the former outweighs the latter.
To begin with, one apparent advantage of this method is that with consuming local produced goods, the local businesses would flourish thus, bringing a notable surge in economic status of that nation. Also, providing fresh vegetables and herbs daily, can boost residents’ diet and health significantly. Moreover, as a result of not transporting foods from long distances, the usage of preservatives from our foods would be eliminated, therefore, we can enjoy nutritious meals without harmful chemical substances entering our bodies.
On the contrary side, there are some principle issues to address. The main problem of this idea arises from the fact that several parts of the globe are not suitable for farm activities, for instance, in some areas, soils can be infertile or in the warmer, less humid parts of the earth, the hot weather conditions can obliterate any forms of agriculture. Moreover, with the removal of food exchange between distinct places, many materials that are used daily in our meals would be inaccessible, consequently, missing out on a variety of delicious foods from different cultures.
In conclusion, although there are various advantageous points mentioned, I firmly believe that the drawbacks would be destructive for food industries and vanishing transported goods can lead to disastrous outcomes.