The idea that historical objects displayed in museums all over the world should be returned to the country of origin is widely debated nowadays. Although returning objects can help preserve cultural identity, I still hold the opinion that museums should be allowed to protect historical objects carefully.
One major reason why museums should return historical objects to the original country is that these objects are an important part of a national heritage. Returning them can help local communities reconnect with their history and find their identity values. Therefore, historical objects will be exhibited in museums in original countries, helping broaden people’s knowledge about traditional culture and identity. For example, schools and communities should organize some extra lessons outside schools, teaching children about their national heritage.
Although the opinion that historical objects should be returned to the original country has some benefits, I believe that these objects must have been carefully preserved. Many museums have experts and specialised facilities to protect valuable objects from damage. For example, museums can use controlled temperature and humidity levels to protect historical objects. Moreover, some fragile objects can be damaged due to the delivery process, and when they are given back to the country of origin, it may be no longer normal. As a result, a form of invaluable items can become worthless, removing time-honored traditions.
Ultimately, although returning historical objects to their countries of origin can help preserve cultural identity, I believe that museums should be allowed to protect these objects because they can preserve them effectively and make them accessible to people around the world.