Some people believe that housing is the most necessary factor, so the government should implement free houses for those living in poverty. I wholeheartedly concur that it’s a positive to do as it enables them to live equally as others.
Many proponents advocate to not to allocate apartments to poor families without the charges. If the government spends money for them, it may bring some critical arguments from the rest of the citizens as they can also require such assistance from the country. Therefore, making homes free for homeless ones may not be a great option. Moreover, providing another supply instead of the housing seems to be a positive side. For example, by giving people food resources including fruits, vegetables, and even medical treatment.
However, encouraging people who cannot afford private houses significantly helps them a lot. These days, many businesses spending their vast amounts of funding on infrastructures of city centers as it seems to be a good development, but it is going to be superior if they divide some of it for its residents. Encouraging rich ones, on the other hand, is the second beneficial side. Participating in charities by giving any amount of money would be a negligible raise, therefore, it would also help the government’s economy.
In conclusion, while some people emphasize making houses free for poor families may pose the government at a disadvantage, I firmly believe that seeking assistance from other manufacturers would dramatically prevent thus obstacle.
Can u also count the words