In contemporary capitals, the idea of dividing stores, schools, offices and apartments into different zones becomes popular. While some people find this changes beneficial, I believe that reconstructions in cities will have numerous drawbacks.
On the bright side, placing educational, working and residential buildings separately in diverse areas can provide facilities for people. If they need goods or employment there will be several choices for them in one place. Children will not walk near to skyscrapers or supermarkets, employees will not search for work in different corners of the city. For instance, Silicon Valley is the technological center in the USA by organizing workspace for specialists in sphere of technology it became incredibly famous. As a result, reaching the necessary place for certain needs is one of the positives of this scheme.
However, from a logical view it is apparent that there will be financial losses and the possible dangers. For reaching the area where shops are located, citizens will spend more time and money because of petrol. Furthermore, companies can suffer from the positioning in one place with potential competitors. Therefore, the opportunities of specific locations will fade. Nonetheless, the most disadvantageous side is natural disasters. Although, technologies are well developed in modern life, there is no guarantee for protection from earthquakes, floods and hurricanes. For example, earthquake can destroy shops area and all accessible markets will be under the ruins. In view of this facts, I think that this kind of allocations will lead into fatal outcomes.
To conclude, although relocations will provide convenience for people to get in several place, the financial struggles and natural dangers illustrates the downsides of this trend. Therefore, on balance, I suppose that negatives outweigh possible benefits.