Old buildings are immutable parts of a country and reflect its values, traditions, and history. In modern life, a myriad of former facilities are renovated and changed with new ones because of the shortage of space. Personally, I am convinced that this modernization has more benefits than drawbacks.
On the upside, the obvious advantage of this movement is urban development. For example, many cities replace old structures with modern skyscrapers to support business activities. This is because modern infrastructure attracts investment, creates new jobs, and provides better facilities for residents. This leads to faster economic growth and improved living standards.
On the downside, there are significant disadvantages of this modernization that harm the country and society. First of all, this development leads to the loss of cultural heritage and historical identity. Ancient constructions represent history and identity. For instance, Maiden Tower in Baku is visited by both several tourists and a myriad of local residents, and individuals can obtain new information about the history and culture of Azerbaijan. Destroying these areas can reduce people’s sense of belonging. In addition, it can result in a negative impact on tourism. For instance, old constructions in cities like Rome attract millions of tourists every year, which boosts the economy. If these buildings are demolished, tourism may decline significantly.
In summary, I would thus argue that despite the advantages of demolishing old constructions, maintaining them seems to be more beneficial for both the country and society. I hope everyone will understand the values of old constructions and preserve them for future generations.