Employee issue has always been one of the actual topics. It claimed that in certain nations, it is unlawful for organizations to refuse occupation petitioners relating to their age. While there are both merits and shortcomings of this standpoints. I, from my own perspective, believe that the former takes precedence over the latter.
To begin with, one noteworthy downside is that there are some restrictions of private companies. That is to say that private company should elaborate their own rule and this idea could contradict to this. A good example of this would be that according to the recent research made by academics of Germany showed that organizations that have their own rule more promising than government is suggested them. The second negative aspect is they could accept on job young cohort, if there are not restriction relating to their age. In the other words if there are not any restriction it can lead to incompetence of workers.
On the other hand, this viewpoint has utopian aspects as well, and in my opinion they may overshadow any possible demerits. One crucial advantageous side is the fact that the old cohort could find a suitable job, because in the current time old generation suffer from jobless, and this way of thinking would solve this dilemma. Another upside of this viewpoint that almost all people could have job, that significantly reduce crimes in the county.
To sum up, it is claimed that in several countries, it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants concerning their age. According to my way of thinking, the benefits of this statement prevail over the flaws.