In certain nations, the government promulgated laws against age discrimination in hiring. However, from my perspective, I believe that this decision can be a mixed blessing, which will be elaborated in the below essay.
On the one hand, it is believed that prohibiting businesses from rejecting job applicants for age reasons may reduce age prejudice. To be more specific, it can help avoid negative stereotypes about older workers, thereby creating a more diverse workforce, which can bring different perspectives and experiences in order to enhance the manufacturing productivity and also the companies’ total profits. Furthermore, allowing the elderly to continue working may lead to the reduction of pressure on the public budget, which contributes to the economic and infrastructure development of the nations.
On the other hand, being unable to turn down the applicants due to their age might deteriorate the flexibility of the employers. For example, some technological companies may prefer younger employees, who are faster in adapting to new technology. In addition, younger workers can be impacted negatively due to the emergence of age discrimination prohibition in hiring. For instance, a number of young staff might feel less comfortable in environments surrounded by older colleagues, which can affect their job satisfaction and performance.
In conclusion, a ban on rejecting aged employees can be double-edged. While it can avoid negative age prejudice on older workers, whose experiences can positively enhance the company’s profits, a number of businesses’ rights can be affected, leading to the difficulties in finding suitable staffs.