Some individuals argue that yougsters chiefly face plenty of challanges, such as juvenile deliquency, because many married women now work and are not at home in order to take care of their children. I firmly disagree with this statement because not only women but also father figure should have a crucial effect on juveniles, since co-parenting has pleasant impact on child.
On the one hand, since teenage years are the most vulnerable times of life and some individuals may assume that women figure should be at home to care of their children. However, it should be balanced if mental well-being of youngster is not sufficient to endure academic stress or they can’t control their emotions because of hormonal disbalance their parents not only mother but also father should support their child. They can assist their child in multiple ways , for instance, they can spend more time with their child or if the sitation is really detrimental and leave their child at home;they can assign a psychologist to assist him or her in personal and academic life.
On the other hand, there are other aspects ,for example, economic background of family can be very insuffient that why some married women have to work in order to support their family and give better life to their children, and concurrently they can’t afford any support from doctors. Initially, they should acknowledge youngsters about this situation and subsequently attempt to rectify problems with their children by giving more attention or even some basic praises.
To sum up, the chief reason why I disagree is that some individuals only concentrate on women since they think married women should only prioritize their children and face challanges by themselves, but I believe it is an old fashiened mentality. In 21th century it shouldn’t be an issue that only women face