History of nation has been a topic of heated debate over the past few decades. Although, certain individuals believe that historical buildings are replaced by new buildings. I firmly disagree with the given statements my inclination is evaluated in insuring paraphrase and relevant examples.
The foremost argument to justify any stand is that to damage the old history replaced by new history. For example, The CN tower in Canada is the part of the national sign. It is basically represent something different for a country. If you want to down this architecture and then you want to build a new one, how could you represent to your country.
Furthermore, The other reason to prove my point is that build a remarkable name based on that kind of the architecture. For instance, Eden road is memorable for the Eden shopping mall that is the oldest building in the city. So we can’t close this kind of record.
On the contrary, Some people counter claim the mentioned support, the foremost argument is making more technology based buildings those are essential for modern life. In addition, They believe that those city have modern technology based assets they’re more advance then others. But they don’t have any concern about history.
In the sum, It can be said that despite the fact of shut down the remarkable building and then build a new structure is not a good decision. Because every country has some history those are based on different kind of structures. It is true that new structures are always comes with new things. But The kingdom’s memories are also essential for an nation.